Patriotic Oath (Philippines)


The Patriotic Oath is one of two national pledges of the Philippines, the other being the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. It is commonly recited in schools during morning flag ceremony after the Lupang Hinirang is sung but before recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

Custom

Recitation of the Panatà is required by law at all public and private educational institutions meant for Filipinos or containing a majority of Filipino nationals. This guideline was set in Republic Act No. 1265, one of many national symbols laws, which was approved on 11 July 1955. The act was implemented in schools through Department Order No. 8 of what is now the Department of Education, which was approved on 21 July 1955. The Panatà was revised in November 2001 by then Secretary of Education Raul Roco, using shorter lines in less formal Tagalog.
Although Department Order No. 8 states that the Panatà may be recited in English or any Philippine language, the Panatà is usually recited today in Filipino, of which two versions exist: the current text is a shorter rendering of the English original, while the older version is a more direct translation.

Text

Panatang Makabayan


Iniibig ko ang Pilipinas,
aking lupang sinilangan,
tahanan ng aking lahi;
Ako’y kanyang kinukupkop at tinutulungang
maging malakas, masipag at marangal.
Dahil mahal ko ang Pilipinas,
diringgin ko ang payo
ng aking magulang,
susundin ko ang tuntunin ng paaralan,
tutuparin ko ang tungkulin
ng mamamayang makabayan:
naglilingkod, nag-aaral at nagdarasal
nang buong katapatan.
Iaalay ko ang aking buhay,
pangarap, pagsisikap
sa bansang Pilipinas.

Patriotic Oath

I love the Philippines.
It is the land of my birth;
It is the home of my people.
It protects me and helps me to be strong, happy and useful.
In return, I will lead the counsel of my parents;
I will obey the rules of my school;
I will perform the duties of my patriotic, law-abiding citizen;
I will serve my country unselfishly and faithfully
I will be a true Filipino in thought, in words, and in deed.
I offer my life, dreams and hard work to my country - Philippines.

1993 JW students controversy

In 1993, sixty-eight students from the sect Jehovah's Witnesses were expelled from a school in Cebu for their failure to salute the flag, sing the Philippine National Anthem, and recite the patriotic oath. A teacher in the same school, also a JW adherent was fired from her job for the same offense. According to JW teachings, flag ceremonies, flag salutes, and patriotic oaths are viewed as acts of worship or religious devotion, the latter two of which they believe can only be rendered to God alone and not anyone nor anything. The JW's consider the flag an image and honoring the flag idolatry.
The case was brought to court wherein the Cebu Division Superintendent argued that the students and the teacher violated Republic Act No. 1265, the law that makes flag ceremony compulsory for all schools, citing the case of Gerona et al v. Secretary of Education. Superintendent also argued of separation of church and state, stating the flag is devoid of religious significance and does not involve any religious ceremony, and that giving JW's right to exemption disrupt school discipline and demoralize the rest of the school population which by far constitutes the great majority.
The Court ruled in favor of the expelled JW students and the fired JW teacher, on the grounds that expulsion due to religious beliefs is invalid. They also stated of freedom of religion in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines:
Evidence also showed that even if they do not take part in the compulsory flag ceremony, they never engaged in “external acts” or behavior that would offend the people who believe in expressing their love of country through the observance of the flag ceremony. The expelled only quietly stood at attention during the flag ceremony to show their respect for the right of those who choose to participate in the solemn proceedings.
The students were later allowed to re-enroll in the school they were expelled from and the teacher was allowed to resume her duties.