XBRL assurance
XBRL assurance is the auditor's opinion on whether a financial statement or other business report published in XBRL, is relevant, accurate, complete, and fairly presented. An XBRL report is an electronic file and called instance in XBRL terminology.
IFAC and other accounting organizations are discussing the topic to decide on a common approach and XBRL auditing standards. The auditor may give assurance to an XBRL financial statement, an XBRL business report and XBRL real-time reporting. The short term focus is on XBRL financial statements and regulatory reports, while the future focus is expected to be more on real-time reporting.
Digital reporting process
An XBRL report is part of a digital reporting supply chain. The auditor should not focus only on the reliability of the report itself. It is better to focus on the whole supply chain including the communication over a network of the report. The auditor needs to check if the report that has been sent is complete and in time.In assessing the XBRL reporting process the auditor can use a reference model in which the layering of the whole digital reporting supply chain is reflected. The auditor performs an audit on every layer of the digital reporting supply chain, with assistance of experts and use of software tools on specific areas.
A known example of a reference model is the OSI model. The use of a more comprehensive and detailed reference model by the auditor seems logical.
Model
XBRL assurance is a container concept which covers multiple types of XBRL reports, audits, audit reports and related topics. In order for the auditor to be able to give the assurance, several aspects need to be clear:- The identification of the audit object
- The XBRL audit objectives, XBRL auditing standards and audit approach that fit with the XBRL audit object;
- Content of the audit report, the text including the auditor's opinion;
- How to keep the link between the audit object and the audit report with use of the auditor's signature.
- The primary audit object is the XBRL file containing the data. The auditor may give assurance to an XBRL financial statement, an XBRL report or XBRL real-time reporting.
- The secondary audit objects containing metadata that play a role in the XBRL reporting chain:
- *The XBRL taxonomy, in three different instances:
- *# a standard taxonomy
- *# a custom taxonomy
- *# a combination: both standard base-taxonomy and custom extension-taxonomy.
- *Presentation- or rendering metadata may come in different forms: stylesheet, inline XBRL, XBRL rendering linkbase or proprietary software.
A custom taxonomy is not owned by an authoritative body.
Base-taxonomy and extension-taxonomy refer to the XBRL mechanism where an extension-taxonomy refers to -or imports- a base-taxonomy to expand the available reporting concepts and/or their relations.
XBRL assurance can be described using following model:
Primary audit object | XBRL financial statement | XBRL report/filing | Real time reporting |
Aspect | |||
Audit objectives, auditing standards and audit approach | |||
Audit report including the auditor's opinion | |||
Link between audit report and audit object and auditor's signature |
Description
Audit objectives and approach
The following, mainly XBRL specific reporting steps serve as a basis for the audit approach. The auditor checks that:- the right standard taxonomy has been used;
- the custom taxonomy is complete, correct and accurate;
- the sourcedata used for reporting is reliable;
- the correct and complete mapping of sourcedata to taxonomy elements has occurred;
- the XBRL report is technically correct and validates with the taxonomy;
- the sending of the XBRL reporting was complete, accurate and timely.
With a custom taxonomy this is not the case. The auditor needs to validate the custom taxonomy, a secondary audit object. He needs to perform an audit to check if this taxonomy complies with regulations and if it is accurate and complete.
A significant difference with paper based assurance is the concept of material misstatement. Material misstatement concerns the accuracy of the audit opinion on a financial statement or filing as a whole. An XBRL report contains a collection of individually identifiable business facts. The facts are building blocks of an XBRL report. Material misstatement in an XBRL report concerns the individually identifiable business facts.
Audit report
The most common audit report in the world is an external auditor's report on an auditee's financial statements and its accompanying notes. XBRL assurance covers different audit reports depending on the primary and secondary audit objects.To let the auditor to give an opinion on fair view is not obvious. An XBRL report contains little presentation metadata. More presentation metadata is needed to present the XBRL report in a human readable manner.
The auditor opts for an approach whereby the current audit object will be cut in two new audit objects, each with its own audit report and opinion. The primary audit object is the instance containing all the business facts. The secondary audit object contains the presentation or rendering metadata.
The split in primary and secondary audit objects with different audit reports is necessary to prevent any confusion about the assurance the auditor adds to the XBRL financial statement instance or any other XBRL report without presentation in a human readable form.
One approach to this is to have different auditor opinions on the primary audit object and the secondary object that combined make clear the XBRL report provides a fair view.
Electronic Signature
This aspect covers the unbreakable linkage of the audit report and auditor's signature to the audit object. Both the primary and the secondary audit objects are electronic files which can be altered without leaving a trace.All this means that the auditor must use techniques like encryption and electronic signatures, ensuring that his opinion actually came from him and is permanently linked to the audited XBRL audit object without any unauthorized changes.