Valuation using discounted cash flows
Valuation using discounted cash flows is a method of estimating the current value of a company based on projected future cash flows adjusted for the time value of money.
The cash flows are made up of the cash flows within the forecast period, together with a continuing or terminal value that represents the cash flow stream after the forecast period.
In several contexts, DCF valuation is referred to as the "income approach".
Discounted cash flow valuation was used in industry as early as the 1700s or 1800s; it was explicated by John Burr Williams in his The Theory of Investment Value in 1938; it was widely discussed in financial economics in the 1960s; and became widely used in U.S. courts in the 1980s and 1990s.
This article details the mechanics of the valuation, via a worked example, including modifications typical for startups, private equity and venture capital, corporate finance "projects", and mergers and acquisitions.
See Discounted cash flow for further discussion, and for context.
Basic formula for firm valuation using DCF model
Value of firm =where
- FCFF is the free cash flow to the firm as reduced for tax
- WACC is the weighted average cost of capital, combining the cost of equity and the after-tax cost of debt
- t is the time period
- n is the number of time periods to "maturity" or exit
- g is the sustainable growth rate at that point
The second term represents the continuing value of future cash flows beyond the forecasting term; here applying a "perpetuity growth model".
Note that for valuing equity, as opposed to "the firm", free cash flow to equity or dividends are modeled, and these are discounted at the cost of equity instead of WACC which incorporates the cost of debt.
Free cash flows to the firm are those distributed among – or at least due to – all securities holders of a corporate entity ; to equity, are those distributed to shareholders only.
Where the latter are dividends then the dividend discount model can be applied, modifying the formula above.
Use
The diagram aside shows an overview of the process of company valuation. All steps are explained in detail [|below].Determine forecast period
The initial step is to decide the forecast period, i.e. the time period for which the individual yearly cash flows input to the DCF formula will be explicitly modeled. Cash flows after the forecast period are represented by a single number.The forecast period must be chosen to be appropriate to the company's strategy, its market, or industry; theoretically corresponding to the time for the company's return to "converge" to that of its industry, with constant, long term growth applying to the continuing value thereafter; although, regardless, 5–10 years is common in practice.
For private equity and venture capital investments, the period will depend on the investment timescale and exit strategy.
See further under Forecast period, as well as [|§ Determine the continuing value] below.
Determine cash flow for each forecast period
As above, an explicit cash flow forecast is required for each year during the forecast period. These must be "Free cash flow" or dividends.Typically, this forecast will be constructed using historical internal accounting and sales data, in addition to external industry data and economic indicators.
The key aspect of the forecast is, arguably, predicting revenue, a function of the analyst's forecasts re market size, demand, inventory availability, and the firm's market share and market power;
future costs, fixed and variable, as well as capital, can then be estimated as a function of sales via "common-sized analysis".
At the same time, the resultant line items must talk to the business' operations: in general, growth in revenue will require corresponding increases in working capital, fixed assets and associated financing; and in the long term, profitability should tend to the industry average, as mentioned above; see, and.
Approaches to identifying which assumptions are most impactful on the value – and thus need the most attention – and to model "calibration" are discussed below. For the components / steps of business modeling here, see the list for "Equity valuation" under, as well as financial forecast more generally.
There are several context dependent modifications:
- Importantly, in the case of a startup, substantial costs are often incurred at the start of the first year – and with certainty – and these should then be modelled separately from other cash flows, and not discounted at all. Ongoing costs, and capital requirements, can be proxied on a similar company, or industry averages; analogous to the "common-sized" approach mentioned.
- For corporate finance projects, cash flows should be estimated incrementally, i.e. the analysis should only consider cash flows that could change if the proposed investment is implemented.
- For an M&A valuation the free cash flow is the amount of cash available to be paid out to all investors in the company after necessary investments for the business plan being valued. Synergies or strategic opportunities will often be dealt with either by probability weighting / haircutting these, or by separating these into their own DCF valuation where a higher discount rate reflects their uncertainty. Tax will receive very close attention. Often each business-line will be valued separately in a sum-of-the-parts analysis.
- When valuing financial service firms, FCFE or dividends are typically modeled, as opposed to FCFF. This is because, often, capital expenditures, working capital and debt are not clearly defined for these corporates, and cash flows to the firm, and hence enterprise value, cannot then be easily estimated. Discounting is correspondingly at the cost of equity. Further, as these firms operate within a highly regulated environment, forecast assumptions must incorporate this reality, and outputs must similarly be "bound" by regulatory limits.
Determine discount factor / rate
A fundamental element of the valuation is to determine the appropriate required rate of return, as based on the risk level associated with the company and its market.Typically, for an established company:
- For the cost of equity, the analyst will apply a model such as the CAPM most commonly; see and Beta. An unlisted company’s Beta can be based on that of a listed proxy as adjusted for gearing, ie debt, via Hamada's equation.
- The cost of debt may be calculated for each period as the scheduled after-tax interest payment as a percentage of outstanding debt; see.
- The value-weighted combination of these will then return the appropriate discount rate for each year of the forecast period. As the weight of debt could vary over the forecast, each date's discount factor will be compounded over the periods to that date.
In its early stages, where the business is more likely to fail, a higher return is demanded in compensation;
when mature, an approach similar to the preceding may be applied.
See: ;.
Corporate finance analysts usually apply the first, listed company, approach: here though it is the risk-characteristics of the project that must determine the cost of equity, and not those of the parent company.
M&A analysts likewise apply the first approach, with risk as well as the target capital structure informing both the cost of equity and, naturally, WACC.
Determine current value
To determine current value, the analyst calculates the current value of the future cash flows simply by multiplying each period's cash flow by the discount factor for the period in question; see time value of money.Where the forecast is yearly, an adjustment is sometimes made: although annual cash flows are discounted, it is not true that the entire cash flow comes in at the year end; rather, cash will flow in over the full year. To account for this, a "mid-year adjustment" is applied via the discount rate, affecting the required averaging.
Determine the continuing value
The continuing, or "terminal" value, is the estimated value of all cash flows after the forecast period.- Typically the approach is to calculate this value using a "perpetuity growth model", essentially returning the value of the future cash flows via a geometric series. Key here is the treatment of the long term growth rate, and correspondingly, the forecast period number of years assumed for the company to arrive at this mature stage; see and.
- The alternative, exit multiple approach, assumes that the business will be sold at the end of the projection period at some multiple of its final explicitly forecast cash flow: see Valuation using multiples. This is often the approach taken for venture capital valuations, where an exit transaction is explicitly planned.
Note that this step carries more risk than the previous: being more distant in time, and effectively summarizing the company's future, there is more uncertainty as compared to the explicit forecast period; and yet, potentially this result contributes a significant proportion of the total value.
Here, a very high proportion may suggest a flaw in the valuation ; but at the same time may, in fact, reflect how investors make money from equity investments – i.e. predominantly from capital gains or price appreciation. Its implied exit multiple can then act as a check, or "triangulation", on the perpetuity derived number.
Given this dependence on terminal value, analysts will often establish a "valuation range", or sensitivity table, corresponding to various appropriate – and internally consistent – discount rates, exit multiples and perpetuity growth rates.
For a discussion of the risks and advantages of the two methods, see.
For the valuation of mining projects the forecast period is the same as the "life of mine" – i.e. the DCF model will explicitly forecast all cashflows due to mining the reserve
– and a continuing value is therefore not part of the valuation.
Determine equity value
The equity value is the sum of the present values of the explicitly forecast cash flows, and the continuing value; see and.Where the forecast is of free cash flow to firm, as above, the value of equity is calculated by subtracting any outstanding debts from the total of all discounted cash flows; where free cash flow to equity has been modeled, this latter step is not required – and the discount rate would have been the cost of equity, as opposed to WACC.
The accuracy of the DCF valuation will be impacted by the accuracy of the various inputs and assumptions.
Addressing this, private equity and venture capital analysts, in particular, apply the following.
With the first two, the output price is then market related, and the model will be driven by the relevant variables and assumptions. The latter two can be applied only at this stage.
- The DCF value is invariably "checked" by comparing its corresponding P/E or EV/EBITDA to the same of a relevant company or sector, based on share price or most recent transaction. This assessment is especially useful when the terminal value is estimated using the perpetuity approach; and can then also serve as a model "calibration". The use of traditional multiples may be limited in the case of startups – where profit and cash flows are often negative – and ratios such as price/sales are then employed.
- Very commonly, analysts will produce a valuation range, especially based on different terminal value assumptions as mentioned. They may also carry out a sensitivity analysis – measuring the impact on value for a small change in the input – to demonstrate how "robust" the stated value is; and identify which model inputs are most critical to the value. This allows for focus on the inputs that "really drive value", reducing the need to estimate dozens of variables.
- Analysts often also generate scenario-based valuations, based on different assumptions on economy-wide, "global" factors as well as company-specific factors. In theory, an "unbiased" value is the probability-weighted average of the various scenarios ; see First Chicago Method. Note that in practice the required probability factors are usually too uncertain to do this.
- An extension of scenario-based valuations is to use Monte Carlo simulation, passing relevant model inputs through a spreadsheet risk-analysis add-in, such as @Risk or Crystal Ball. The output is a histogram of DCF values, which allows the analyst to read the expected value over the inputs, or the probability that the investment will have at least a particular value, or will generate a specific return. The approach is sometimes applied to corporate finance projects, see. But, again, in the venture capital context, it is not often applied, seen as adding "precision but not accuracy"; and the investment in time is then judged as unlikely to be warranted.
An investor in listed equity will compare the value per share to the share's traded price, amongst other stock selection criteria. To the extent that the price is lower than the DCF number, so she will be inclined to invest; see Margin of safety and Undervalued stock. The above calibration will be less relevant here; reasonable and robust assumptions more so.
A related approach is to "reverse engineer" the stock price; i.e. to "figure out how much cash flow the company would be expected to make to generate its current valuation... depending on the plausibility of the cash flows, decide whether the stock is worth its going price."
More extensively, using a DCF model, investors can "estimat the expectations embedded in a company's stock price.... then assess the likelihood of expectations revisions."
Corporations will often have several potential projects under consideration, see. NPV is typically the primary selection criterion between these; although other investment measures considered, as visible from the DCF model itself, include ROI, IRR and payback period.
Private equity and venture capital teams will similarly consider various measures and criteria, as well as recent comparable transactions, when selecting between potential investments; the valuation will typically be one step in, or following, a thorough due diligence.
For an M&A valuation, the DCF will be one of several valuation results "combined" into a single number ; thereafter, other factors listed below, will then be considered in conjunction with this value.
Literature
Standard texts- Richard Brealey, Stewart Myers, Franklin Allen. Principles of Corporate Finance. Mcgraw-Hill
- Aswath Damodaran. '. Wiley
- Tim Koller, Marc Goedhart, David Wessels . '. John Wiley & Sons.
- W. Brotherson, K. Eades, R. Harris, R. Higgins. , Journal of Applied Finance, Vol. 24;2.
- Goort de Bruijn and Wout Bobbink. . ey.com/nl
- Aswath Damodaran. . New York University Stern School of Business
- Aswath Damodaran. . New York University Stern School of Business
- Frank Fabozzi, Sergio M. Focardi, Caroline Jonas. . CFA Institute Research Foundation
- Pablo Fernandez. . IESE Research Papers. D549
- Pablo Fernandez. . EFMA 2002 London Meetings
- Edward J. Green, Jose A. Lopez, and Zhenyu Wang. . Federal Reserve Bank of New York
- Campbell Harvey. . Duke University Fuqua School of Business
- International Federation of Accountants.
- T. Keck, E. Levengood, and A. Longfield. Using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis in an International Setting: A Survey of Issues in Modeling the Cost of Capital, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Fall, pp. 82–99.
- Eric Kirzner . Rotman School of Management
- Kubr, Marchesi, Ilar, Kienhuis. . McKinsey & Company
- R. S. Ruback. . Harvard Business School
- Tham, Joseph and Tran Viet Thang.
- , Aswath Damodaran
- , Alfred Rappaport and Michael J. Mauboussin