Timor–Alor–Pantar languages


The Timor–Alor–Pantar languages are a family of Papuan languages spoken in Timor, Kisar, and the Alor archipelago in Southern Indonesia.
Holton and Klamer classify Timor–Alor–Pantar as an independent language family, as they did not find convincing links with Trans-New Guinea.
Usher finds them to be one of three branches of the West Bomberai family within Trans–New Guinea, with regular sound correspondences.

Languages

The languages are demonstrably related, with the Alor–Pantar languages forming a distinct subgroup. The following conservative classification is from Ross, Schapper et al., and Holton et al..
The list given above is conservative, without any undemonstrated groups.
Bunak and the Alor–Pantar languages are sometimes grouped together as "West Timor", while Bunak and East Timor have been grouped as "Timor–Kisar". Although the Alor–Pantar languages are clearly related, as are the Timor–Kisar languages and the two groups to each other, until comparative work is done on all languages simultaneously it will not be clear whether Bunak is closer to East Timor or to Alor–Pantar, or whether Alor–Pantar is a valid node. Kaiping and Klamer, though, found Bunak to be the most divergent Timor-Alor-Pantar language, splitting off before East Timor and Alor-Pantar did.
Languages in Central and East Alor are generally more agglutinative than languages in Pantar and Timor, which are more isolating.

Classification history

Despite their geographic proximity, the Papuan languages of Timor are not closely related, and demonstration of a relationship between any of them is difficult, apart from the clearly related Alor–Pantar languages on the islands neighboring Timor.
Arthur Capell first proposed that the Timor languages were a family in 1941, and Watuseke & Anceaux did the same for Timor–Alor–Pantar in 1973. Both units have been broken up in more recent classifications, though their ultimate relationship is generally accepted.
In 1957 HKL Cowan linked the Timor languages to the West Papuan family. However, when Stephen Wurm expanded Trans–New Guinea in 1975, he decided Timor–Alor–Pantar belonged there, and he linked it to the South Bird's Head languages in a South Bird's Head – Timor–Alor–Pantar branch of that phylum. Wurm noted similarities with West Papuan, a different family, but suggested this was due to substratum influence.
Ross classifies Timor–Alor–Pantar with the West Bomberai languages, the two groups forming a branch within West Trans–New Guinea. Based on a careful examination of new lexical data, Holton & Robinson find little evidence to support a connection between TAP and TNG. However, Holton & Robinson concedes that a relationship with Trans-New Guinea and West Bomberai in particular is the most likely hypothesis, though they prefer to leave it unclassified for now.
Usher finds that the Timor–Alor–Pantar fit within the West Bomberai languages, as a third branch of that family, and has begun to reconstruct the West Bomberai protolanguage as the ancestor of Timor–Alor–Pantar, as well as proto–Timor–Alor–Pantar itself.

Language contact

The Timor–Alor–Pantar languages have been in considerable contact with these Austronesian languages:

Phonology

Holton & Klamer reconstruct the Proto–Timor–Alor–Pantar consonant inventory as follows:
Proto–Alor–Pantar developed a voiceless uvular stop *q but lost *f and some of the liquids.
Usher reconstructs a somewhat different inventory:
*l and *r do not occur initially in native words.
Usher reconstructs the vowels as *i *u *a *ɒ and the diphthong *ai.
Heston reconstructs the vowels *a, *e, *i, *o, *u, and *ə.
Heston also proposes that Proto–Timor–Alor–Pantar had penultimate stress when the penultimate and final syllables were both light, and final stress when the final syllable was heavy.

Pronouns

Proto-Timor–Alor–Pantar pronouns as reconstructed by Ross are:
Usher reconstructs the free and bound forms of the pronouns as:
These have regular paradigms, with suffixes *-i and *-u on the bound forms, so for example 1sg is free *an, direct object and inalienable possessor *na-, locative, ergative and alienable possessor *nai, and dative *nau.
Ross suggest these pronouns reflect proto-Trans–New Guinea 1st person *na, *ni and 2nd person *ga, *gi, and possibly the pTNG dual/inclusive *-pi-. The objection has been raised that this requires positing a "flip-flop" in which proto-TNG second-person pronouns correspond to proto-TAP third-person pronouns. Usher however establishes that proto–West Bomberai initial *k was lost from proto–Timor–Alor–Pantar, and that the proto–West Bomberai pronouns 2sg *ka and 2pl *ki, inherited from proto–Trans–New Guinea, correspond regularly to proto–Timor–Alor–Pantar *a and *i, while the proto–Timor–Alor–Pantar third-person pronouns *ga and *gi do not correspond to the rest of West Bomberai and are only coincidentally similar to the reconstructed proto-TNG second-person pronouns.

Lexicon

Schapper, et al. reconstruct the following proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar, proto-Alor-Pantar, and proto-Timor forms, demonstrating the relatedness of the Timor and Alor-Pantar languages.
;proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar reconstructions

Evolution

Pawley and Hammarström list the following probable reflexes of Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar and proto-Alor-Pantar from proto-Trans-New Guinea.
;Key: pTNG = proto-Trans New Guinea, pTAP = proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar, pAP = proto-Alor-Pantar
However, Holton and Robinson classify Timor-Alor-Pantar as an independent language family, rather than as part of Trans-New Guinea.