This sonnet continues the theme of Sonnet 38, in which the sweet argument of the young man is predicted to inspire endless invention. Sonnets 76 and 38 share four key words: invention, sweet, write and argument. This sonnet begins by asking why the poet's verse is lacking in new variations, why the poet doesn't look around at the verse of others and pick up some of the latest fashions, and why his verse is always dressed in a familiar style. The poem's reference to the writings of others anticipates the "Rival Poet" sequence, which more explicitly considers other poets. The poem answers its own questions by pointing out that his best work is inspired by fidelity to the subject of the poems. The sonnet seems to be sincerely self-denigrating about the poet's lack of variety, and lack of incorporating the latest fashions, but at the same time there is a sense that the self-effacing pose doesn't ring true. There is instead a self-asserting quality being implied: that when the poet compares himself with others in the first quatrain they appear to be mere followers of fashion, and that his way of writing is a way for a writer to achieve a style that is distinct. There is also the assertion implied in the sestet that the poet requires fidelity to his subject in order to arrive at a proper style, as opposed to the fickle valuing of constantly changing fashions. The poet's values, including fidelity to his subject, become dominant by the end of the sonnet, which is suggested metaphorically by the evolution of the meaning of the wordlove. It is first used to refer to the young man, then in the next line the meaning is changed, and love is something that parallels the young man. Then in the last line the change is complete so that love identifies the poet. The image of the rising and setting sun invites the initial assumption that it will refer to the young man as the sun, but that assumption is derailed when the last line indicates that the sun is a metaphor for the poet's love as expressed in verse.
× / × / × / × / × / That every word doth almost tell my name,
The 1st line begins with a common variation, an initial reversal, and ends with a less-frequent one, the rightward movement of the 4th ictus. The 2nd line repeats the minor ionic at the same point in the line:
/ × × / × / × × / / Why is my verse so barren of new pride, × / × / ×/ × × / / So far from variation or quick change?