Socioeconomic decile
In the New Zealand education system, decile is a key measure of socioeconomic status used to target funding and support schools. In academic contexts the full term "socioeconomic decile" or "socioeconomic decile band" may be used.
A school's decile indicates the extent to which the school draws its students from low socioeconomic communities. Decile 1 schools are the 10% of schools with the highest proportion of students from low socio-economic communities.
This system was implemented in 1995. Its exact nature has changed since then.
Details
A school's socioeconomic decile is recalculated by the Ministry of Education every five years, using data collected after each Census of Population and Dwellings. They are calculated between censuses for new schools and merged schools, and other schools may move up or down one decile with school openings, mergers and closures to ensure each decile contains 10 percent of all schools. Current deciles were calculated in 2014 following the 2013 census. The previous deciles came into force in 2008 following the 2006 census.Before the deciles are calculated, Statistics New Zealand calculates the following factors in each individual meshblock, disregarding any household in the meshblock that does not have school-aged children:
- Household income: the proportion of households whose total income, adjusted for householder composition, is in the bottom 20 percent nationally
- Occupation: the proportion of employed parents who work in low-skilled or unskilled occupations, specifically those that have skill-levels 4 and 5 on the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations
- Household crowding: the proportion of households which are overcrowded, that is, in which there are more people living in the house than there are bedrooms, adjusting for couples and children under 10.
- Educational qualifications: the proportion of parents who have no formal qualifications
- Income support: the proportion of parents who receive the Domestic Purposes Benefit, Unemployment Benefit, Sickness Benefit or Invalid's Benefit
This gives a broad measure of the relative poverty, or aggregated socioeconomic, of the parents or care-givers of students at the school, with decile 1 schools being the 10% of schools with the lowest socioeconomic communities and decile 10 schools being at the other end of the scale.
Note that some types of schools acquire a decile rating regardless of the socioeconomic status of the school community. For example, teen-parent units always "belong" in decile 1, because of the inherent effect teenage pregnancy and parenthood has on teen parents' socioeconomic status, regardless whether the teen-parent unit is in a high SES area or attached to a high-decile school.
Decile ratings apply only for the funding of compulsory education, but a number of different central-government funding-streams and support services to schools are strongly affected by the decile rating of a school, with more funding available to lower-decile schools. The funding and support measures include:
- Targeted Funding for Educational Achievement
- Special Education Grant
- Careers Information Grant
- Kura Kaupapa Maori Transport
- Priority Teacher Supply Allowance
- National Relocation Grant
- Decile Discretionary Funding for Principals
- Resource Teachers of Learning and Behaviour Learning Support Funding
- RTLBs for years 11–13
- School Property Financial Assistance scheme
- Study Support Centres
- Social Workers in Schools
- District Truancy Service
| Decile | Step | TFEA | SEG | CIG |
| 1 | A | $914.87 | $74.68 | $37.68 |
| 1 | B | $850.53 | $74.68 | $37.68 |
| 1 | C | $738.61 | $74.68 | $37.68 |
| 2 | D | $623.98 | $72.55 | $36.21 |
| 2 | E | $512.08 | $72.55 | $36.21 |
| 2 | F | $424.74 | $72.55 | $36.21 |
| 3 | G | $353.75 | $68.28 | $33.23 |
| 3 | H | $280.09 | $68.28 | $33.23 |
| 3 | I | $222.79 | $68.28 | $33.23 |
| 4 | J | $184.57 | $64.02 | $30.27 |
| 4 | K | $151.49 | $64.02 | $30.27 |
| 4 | L | $136.47 | $64.02 | $30.27 |
| 5 | M | $116.92 | $59.75 | $27.34 |
| 6 | N | $94.94 | $55.48 | $22.16 |
| 7 | O | $72.36 | $51.23 | $18.43 |
| 8 | P | $47.33 | $46.97 | $16.99 |
| 9 | Q | $29.22 | $42.68 | $16.25 |
| 10 | Z | — | $38.43 | $15.51 |
Statistical data about primary and secondary schools and their students can be broken down into socioeconomic deciles. For example, data released by the Ministry of Education shows correlations between high decile schools and higher rates of attaining NCEA Level 2, higher rates of tertiary education entrance, and lower rates of truancy..
Examples
The following table lists the decile ratings of thirty state secondary schools in Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch.Criticism
The decile system has come in for criticism from the teacher and principal associations in recent years for fomenting destructive competition between schools and the exacerbation of white flight. Data from the Ministry of Education indicated that 60,000 Pakeha/NZ European students attended low-decile schools in 2000, but that number had halved by 2010, while high-decile schools had a corresponding increase in Pakeha students. The Ministry claimed demographic changes were behind the shifts, but the Secondary Principals Association and PPTA have attributed white flight to racial and class stigmas of low-decile schools, which commonly have majority Maori and Pacific Islander rolls.A visiting Fulbright Scholar, Professor Chris Lubienski, carried out research that found discrepancies in 36 of the 49 secondary school zones in Auckland. According to Prof Lubienski, principals of schools in the 36 zones anonymously confessed to deliberately skewing their zone boundaries, in order to encourage the enrolment of students from wealthier backgrounds, while preventing the enrolment of poorer students to these schools. In response, Mount Albert Grammar School headmaster Dale Burden countered that school zones "cannot be easily manipulated and changing them is a transparent process". The Ministry of Education issued the following statement:
The purpose of an enrolment zone is to ensure the selection of applicants for enrolment is fair and transparent and makes the best use of the school network.
As far as possible, an enrolment scheme must not exclude local students so that no more students are excluded from a school than is necessary to avoid over-crowding.
The ministry has recently updated guidelines on enrolments zones. They make clear that before drawing up an enrolment zone boards are required to consult parents and the wider community as well as other schools.
Householder income should not be considered when zones are drawn up.
The law requires a board to ensure all students can attend a reasonably convenient school while ensuring other schools do not experience enrolment problems.
If a school board is unable to agree a boundary arrangement the ministry can step in to resolve the matter. If necessary, the ministry has powers to require a board to amend a proposed enrolment zone.
Proposals to replace
In July 2017 Education Minister Nikki Kaye of the Fifth National Government announced plans to replace the system "...as early as 2019..." by a system of targeted funding based on how many "at risk" children a particular school has enrolled. Her government lost power later in 2017.In September 2019 the Sixth Labour Government announced the decile system would be replaced by a new "Equity Index" which would come into effect as early as 2021.