The Singapore Freeport is a high-security storage and display facility in Singapore. A majority stake is held by Natural Le Coultre S.A. of art dealer and shipper Yves Bouvier. The facility opened in May 2010 in a duty-free zone near Singapore’s Changi Airport and is modelled after similar institutions in Geneva and Luxembourg. The Freeport has been on sale since 2017, although no buyer has yet been found.
The Freeport building was designed by architects and security experts from Switzerland. Owing to its security features, the facility has been described as "part bunker, part gallery" and "Singapore’s Fort Knox for fine art and collectibles." The Freeport’s interior features furniture by contemporary designers Ron Arad and Johanna Grawunder. Covering 30,000 square meters, the facility sports climate-controlled storage rooms. Among its most prominent corporate clients was auction houseChristie’s, which rented more than a third of the Freeport’s storage space until it pulled out in 2018, and Deutsche Bank, which used it to store gold bullion worth $8.9 billion but stated it is no longer a customer there. The Freeport has been credited as one reason, besides the government’s exempting of investment-grade precious metals trading from goods and services tax, that Singapore has been slowly reclaiming its role as a physical gold trading hub. According to Bloomberg, the Freeport has reportedly accumulated losses of S$14.4 million over about ten years until 2018, and any potential buyer would inherit a S$20 million debt to Singapore’s largest bank, DBS Group Holdings. Just like the Geneva and Luxembourg facilities, the Singapore freeport, as the entire freeport concept, has been called into question since the Bouvier Affair, in which Yves Bouvier allegedly misrepresented the cost of artworks and subsequently overcharged clients. A 2018 European Commission report also observed that freeports increased in demand as banks began fighting illegal financial activities, making them potential hotspots for financial crime.
An article published by The Economist in 2013 named the Singapore Freeport as one of such facilities possibly used by ultra-rich elites to evade taxes thanks to the facility’s confidentiality. This prompted Singapore Customs to demand the Freeport’s management to respond to The Economist’s claims. The Freeport denied the truthfulness of the article.
2014 NRA Report
A 2014 National Risk Assessment Report by the Monetary Authority of Singapore identified the Freeport as a potential risk for illicit financial activities. Company Chairman Tony Reynard at that time denied this possibility, stating that "all operations at the Singapore Freeport are under the supervision of Singapore Customs, which can access anything at any time." However, Freeport managers have admitted to having no knowledge of what is being stored inside the facility due to the strict policy of discretion with the clients.
In its 2016 mutual evaluation report on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures, the FATF identified the Freeport as "as an emerging risk to consider" as it presented "a medium to high" money-laundering and terrorist-financing risk. The report further noted that "The relevant authorities…did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of what activities were being undertaken in the Singapore Freeport."
Storage of looted objects
In 2016, a UNESCO report on the protection of cultural heritage sites identified the Freeports in Geneva, Luxembourg and Singapore as a “possible problem for the protection of cultural property and its illicit trafficking” and warned that these facilities could be used "to store works of art from thefts, lootings or illicit excavations for resale in the black market...even many years later."
