Schur–Weyl duality forms an archetypical situation in representation theory involving two kinds of symmetry that determine each other. Consider the tensor space The symmetric groupSk on k letters acts on this space by permuting the factors, The general linear groupGLn of invertible n×n matrices acts on it by the simultaneous matrix multiplication, These two actions commute, and in its concrete form, the Schur–Weyl duality asserts that under the joint action of the groups Sk and GLn, the tensor space decomposes into a direct sum of tensor products of irreducible modules that actually determine each other, The summands are indexed by the Young diagramsD with k boxes and at most n rows, and representations of Sk with different D are mutually non-isomorphic, and the same is true for representations of GLn. The abstract form of the Schur–Weyl duality asserts that two algebras of operators on the tensor space generated by the actions of GLn and Sk are the full mutual centralizers in the algebra of the endomorphisms
Example
Suppose that k = 2 and n is greater than one. Then the Schur–Weyl duality is the statement that the space of two-tensors decomposes into symmetric and antisymmetric parts, each of which is an irreducible module for GLn: The symmetric group S2 consists of two elements and has two irreducible representations, the trivial representation and the sign representation. The trivial representation of S2 gives rise to the symmetric tensors, which are invariant under the permutation of the factors, and the sign representation corresponds to the skew-symmetric tensors, which flip the sign.
The proof uses two algebraic lemmas. Proof: Since U is semisimple by Maschke's theorem, there is a decomposition into simple A-modules. Then. Since A is the left regular representation of G, each simple G-module appears in A and we have that if and only if correspond to the same simple factor of A. Hence, we have: Now, it is easy to see that each nonzero vector in generates the whole space as a B-module and so is simple. Proof: Let. The. Also, the image of W spans the subspace of symmetric tensors. Since, the image of spans. Since is dense in W either in the Euclidean topology or in the Zariski topology, the assertion follows. The Schur–Weyl duality now follows. We take to be the symmetric group and the d-th tensor power of a finite-dimensional complex vector spaceV. Let denote the irreducible -representation corresponding to a partition and. Then by Lemma 1 is irreducible as a -module. Moreover, when is the left semisimple decomposition, we have: which is the semisimple decomposition as a -module.