The doline is shaped like an egg and it is highly regular, with the slope almost constant on all its sides. The biggest length is equal to. The doline is somewhat wider in the northern part than in the southern part. Its perimeter is approximately, while the maximum depth is. The lowest point has heightfrom the sea level. Therefore, the doline turns out to be smaller but a little deeper than Pulo di Altamura.
Etymology
The etymology of toponym pulo is currently unknown. It is used only in the Murgeplateau to denote a doline, while it is unused in other regions of Apulia. The term is also used for the nearby dolines Pulo di Altamura, Pulo di Molfetta, and Pulicchio di Toritto, and it is attested as early as in the 17th century, since Domenico Santoro in 1688, referring to Pulo di Altamura, wrote "luogo detto dalli Cittadini lo Pulo".
Te first thorough scientific study on Pulicchio di Gravina dates back to Carmelo Colamonico. Previously, a few other scientists and geologists had only cited a natural cavity near Altamura. For instance, F. Virgilio briefly mentions the doline calling it "pulicchio" and incorrectly traces its origin to an unspecified "underground water erosion". According to Virgilio, the absence of rock masses at the bottom of the doline proves that subsidence occurred due to "underground water erosion". Carmelo Colamonico refutes F. Virgilio's theory pointing out that the absence of rock masses at the bottom of the doline proves, instead, that the origin is due to "superficial erosion".
Origin and evolution
In the same way as Pulo di Altamura and Gurio Lamanna, the origin of Pulicchio di Gravina can be explained through karst processes, i.e. the physical and chemical action of rainwater, that the fractured limestone rock of the Murge plateau underwent over the millennia. Unlike other karst dolines of the region, Pulicchio di Gravina is the endpoint of a very small drainage basin and therefore the amount of rainwater collected inside the doline is very little. Carmelo Colamonico points out that not even the rainwater falling on the area close to the doline manages to reach it. The scarce rainwater is absorbed very quickly. Some farmers of that region stated that "there is never water at the bottom of Pulicchio di Gravina". Furthermore, no noteworthy sinkholes have been discovered inside the doline. Carmelo Colamonico argues that Pulicchio di Gravina originated mainly due to superficial erosion. Nevertheless, just the superficial erosion would not explain both its large size and the proximity to other two dolines, Gurio Lamanna and Tre Paduli. It cannot be excluded the drainage basin of Pulicchio di Gravina may have been larger than today's and it may have been reduced due to the formation of the other two nearby dolines. Nevertheless, the absence of lamas near Pulicchio di Gravina does not seem to confirm this hypothesis. The lama may have been eroded due to the formation of the nearby Gurio Lamanna and Tre Paduli. Another hypothesis is that it might be a "collapse doline", i.e. a doline generated due to the collapse of the ceiling of a pre-existing cave. Even if it is assumed that the origin of the doline was caused by the collapse of a cave, the initial size of it would have been so small that in any case it is necessary to introduce karst action in order to explain the origin of the doline.
Afforestation
As shown on the photo published by Carmelo Colamonico, Pulicchio di Gravina originally did not have any trees inside. In the 1950s, a forest has been established.
