The development includes building 20,885 homes, a commercial district, water reclamation plant, seven public schools, three fire stations, a regional park, three community parks, a golf course, and a lake. of permanent open space would be set aside and of trails developed. The plan includes converting nearly of tributaries and riverbank into storm drains and levees and use of excavated soil to fill in wetlands. The Ventura County line forms part of the western boundary. The Six Flags Magic Mountain theme park and the community of Stevenson Ranch are located to the east, along with the City of Santa Clarita, which has been strongly opposed to the project. The water reclamation plant serving the development will be near the boundary with Ventura County. The plant will treat an estimated of water every day before releasing it into the Santa Clara River as it flows towards the ocean and into Ventura County. The downstream impact and other effects also drew Ventura County officials and citizens into opposition to the project.
Project status
Landmark Village was planned to be the first neighborhood to be built. Mission Village, with 4,000 homes, is currently under construction and will have a "downtown style" mixed-use center. Homestead Village and Portero Village are also being planned. The Newhall Ranch development broke ground in 2017 and the company FivePoint is currently developing the first village.
Approval history
Newhall Ranch has been in planning for decades, facing legal actions, environmental concerns, and repeated investor changes. In July 2017, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors certified a revised environmental analysis. Several lawsuits have been filed in relation to the project over the years by various environmental groups, and Native American tribes. A lawsuit by three environmental groups was settled in 2004. The Lennar Corporation, a national home builder now has a 15% stake in the company with five lenders owning the balance. The developers had hoped to break ground by 2012. In 2014, the California 2nd District Court of Appeal overturned a Los Angeles County Superior Court ruling and found that the environmental impact report adequately analyzed the project's potential impact on endangered fauna and flora and Native Americancultural artifacts. The ruling also supported the agency's determination that storm-drain runoff from the project's into the Santa Clara River would not harm juvenile steelhead trout downstream in Ventura County. Subsequently, the California Supreme Court agreed to review a petition that stated the appellate court opinion exempting developers from protections for the unarmored threespine stickleback would apply to other protected species such as the California Condor. Also of concern is that participation in land-use issues is discouraged by requiring that public comments be submitted early in the environmental review process rather than up to the time of project approval. The environmental review for the Mission Village neighborhood was upheld by a Los Angeles Superior Court in May 2014. In April 2015, the Appellate court affirmed the environmental review for the Landmark Village neighborhood and approved the commence of the neighborhood's construction. However, there are most likely to be more environmental groups that are against the project to sue over Landmark Village. The California Supreme Court ruled in November 2015 that Newhall Land Development Inc. failed to provide evidence in its overall Environmental Impact Report to prove its project was consistent with state guidelines to control harmful greenhouse gases. In May 2016 the state Supreme Court directed lower courts to toss out the EIRs mentioned above for two phases of Newhall Ranch construction. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife certified the environmental impact report in 2017 after changes had been made addressing the Supreme Court's concerns.