Multiple Expression motifs for Motif Elicitation is a tool for discovering motifs in a group of related DNA or protein sequences. A motif is a sequence pattern that occurs repeatedly in a group of related protein or DNA sequences and is often associated with some biological function. MEME represents motifs as position-dependent letter-probability matrices which describe the probability of each possible letter at each position in the pattern. Individual MEME motifs do not contain gaps. Patterns with variable-length gaps are split by MEME into two or more separate motifs. MEME takes as input a group of DNA or protein sequences and outputs as many motifs as requested. It uses statistical modeling techniques to automatically choose the best width, number of occurrences, and description for each motif. MEME is the first of a collection of tools for analyzing motifs called the MEME suite.
Definition
The MEME algorithm could be understood from two different perspectives. From a biological point of view, MEME identifies and characterizes shared motifs in a set of unaligned sequences. From the computer science aspect, MEME finds a set of non-overlapping, approximately matching substrings given a starting set of strings.
Use
With MEME one can find similar biological functions and structures in different sequences. One has to take into account that the sequences variation can be significant and that the motifs are sometimes very small. It is also useful to take into account that the binding sites for proteins are very specific. This makes it easier to reduce wet-lab experiments. Indeed, to better discover the motifs relevant from a biological point of view one has to carefully choose:
In the following example, one has a weight matrix of 3 different sequences, without gaps.
Sequence 1 :
C G G G T A A G T
Sequence 2 :
A A G G T A T G C
Sequence 3 :
C A G G T G A G G
Now one counts the number of nucleotides contained in all sequences:
A :
1 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
7
C :
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3
G :
0 1 3 3 0 1 0 3 1
12
T :
0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1
5
Now one needs to sum up the total: 7+3+12+5 = 27; this gives us a "dividing factor" for each base, or the equivalent probability of each nucleotides. Now one can "redo" the weight matrix by dividing it by the total number of sequences :
A :
0.33
0.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
0.66
0.00
0.00
C :
0.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
G :
0.00
0.33
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
1.00
0.33
T :
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.33
Next, one divides the entries of the WM at position with the probability of the base.
A :
1.29
2.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.57
2.57
0.00
0.00
C :
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
G :
0.00
0.75
2.25
2.25
0.00
0.75
0.00
2.25
0.75
T :
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.40
0.00
1.80
0.00
1.80
In general one would now multiply the probabilities. In our case one would have zero for every one. Due to this we define and take the logarithm:
A :
0.11
0.41
−10
−10
−10
0.41
0.41
−10
−10
C :
0.78
−10
−10
−10
−10
−10
−10
−10
0.48
G :
−10
−0.12
0.35
0.35
−10
−0.12
−10
0.35
−0.12
T :
−10
−10
−10
−10
0.73
−10
0.26
−10
0.26
This is our new weight matrix. One is ready to use an example of a promoter sequence to determine its score. To do this, one has to add the numbers found at the position of the logarithmic WM. For instance, if one takes the AGGCTGATC promoter: This is then divided by the number of entries yielding a score of −2.02.
Shortcomings
The MEME algorithms has several drawbacks including:
Allowance for gaps/substitutions/insertions not included.
Ability to test significance often not included.
Erased input data each time a new motif is discovered.
