The protection provided by the foreskin for the glans penis and meatus has been recognized since 1915. In the absence of the foreskin the meatus is exposed to mechanical and chemical irritation from ammoniacal diaper that produces blister formation and ulceration of the urethral opening, which eventually gives rise to meatal stenosis. Meatal stenosis may also be caused by ischemia resulting from damage to the frenular artery during circumcision.
Risk factors
Frisch & Simonsen carried out a very large-scale study in Denmark, which compared the incidence of meatal stenosis in Muslim males with the incidence of meatal stenosis in ethnic Danish males. The risk of meatal stenosis in circumcised males was found to be as much 3.7 times higher than in the non-circumcised males.
Diagnosis
In boys, history and physical exam is adequate to make the diagnosis. In girls, VCUG is usually diagnostic. Other tests may include:
According to Frisch & Simonsen, "the foreskin is protective against urinary stricture disease". Frisch & Simonsen call for a "thorough reassessment of the burden of urethral troubles and other adverse outcomes after non-therapeutic circumcision of boys." Saeedi et al. propose long-term follow-up of circumcision with ultrasonography "to detect meatal stenosis before permanent renal damage occurs."
Meir & Livne suggest that use of a broad spectrum antibiotic after hypospadias repair will "probably reduce meatal stenosis ", while Jayanthi recommends the use of a modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair.
Treatment
In females, meatal stenosis can usually be treated in the physician's office using local anesthesia to numb the area and dilating the urethral opening with special instruments. In boys, it is treated by a second surgical procedure called meatotomy in which the meatus is crushed with a straight mosquito hemostat and then divided with fine-tipped scissors. Recently, home-dilatation has been shown to be a successfultreatment for most boys.
Prognosis
Most people can expect normal urination after treatment.
Incidence
Numerous studies over a long period of time clearly indicate that male circumcision contributes to the development of urethral stricture. Among circumcised males, reported incidence of meatal stricture varies. Griffiths et al. reported an incidence of 2.8 percent. Sörensen & Sörensen reported 0 percent. Cathcart et al. reported an incidence of 0.55 percent. Yegane et al. reported an incidence of 0.9 percent. Van Howe reported an incidence of 7.29 percent. In Van Howe's study, all cases of meatal stenosis were among circumcised boys. Simforoosh et al. reported an incidence of 0.55 percent. According to Emedicine, the incidence of meatal stenosis runs from 9 to 20 percent. Frisch & Simonsen placed the incidence at 5 to 20 percent of circumcised boys.
