List of state applications for an Article V Convention

This is a list of known applications made to the United States Congress by the states for a national convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution under Article five of the Constitution.
A discussion on the history of this process can be found at Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution.
In particular, discussions on the validity of the recession of applications is discussed there.
All applications are listed here, noting when a recession has been made.
On January 6, 2015 Congress began the process of counting applications submitted by the states with the passage of a House rule in the House of Representatives. Prior to this, all documents related to Article V Applications were read as memorials into the congressional record and referred to the Judiciary Committee. The Clerk of the U.S. House of Representative has since listed all applications and recessions since 1960.
As this list may be removed by a change in house rules, references to the actual congressional record are preferred.
The congressional record prior to 1876 is available through the Library of congress, and online since 1995.
In 1990, Judge Bruce Van Sickle and attorney Lynn M. Boughey compiled a list from the Congressional Record of state applications for an Article V Convention in the Hamline Law Review. Photocopies of the relevant sections of the congressional record have are available through Friends of the Article V Convention for the gap in the electronically available congressional record.

Van Sickle-Boughey classification

In "A Lawful and Peaceful Revolution", Van Sickle and Boughey define five classifications of applications:

Class I: A call for a general convention, with no motivating issue listed
Class II: A call for a general convention, with a separate statement of proposed amendment or explicit statement that the convention may consider other amendments proposed by states
Class III: A call for a general convention tied to a proposed amendment
Class IV: A call for a convention, with language aimed to limit the convention to the issue presented
Class V: A call for a convention, with language to rescind the application from consideration for a convention if any other topic is to be covered

The following is added to this list, where the original text was not recorded in the Congressional Record:

Class ??: A note of an application without the actual text

Van Sickle and Boughey indicate which applications have been rescinded by their state by encasing these in parentheses, and make no note of which applications have led to amendments proposed by Congress.
In the table below, the classification of rescinded applications are stricken, with the year of rescission given in parentheses and a link to the record of the rescission. Those applications which lead to amendments proposed by Congress are listed in parentheses.

List of state applications for an Article V convention

Although all columns are sortable, applications are initially sorted by date passed by the state, or by date of record in the congressional record. Application classes are encased in parentheses if congress presented an amendment on the topic given and stricken if the state has rescinded its application. All descriptions with six or more states have identical amendment text, unless specified. As of December 2019, only the Legislature of Hawaii has never approved an Article V convention application.

State	Issue/Subject	Date of State's Approval	Receipt by Congress	Class
Virginia	Bill of Rights			II 2004
New York	Bill of Rights			II
Georgia	Clarify Amendment X			II
South Carolina	Clarify Amendment X			II
Alabama	Limitation on Tariffs			II
Indiana	General and Unlimited Article V Convention	?		I
Ohio	General and Unlimited Article V Convention			I
New Jersey	Final Resolution for Slavery			II
Kentucky	Final Resolution for Slavery			II
Illinois	Final Resolution for Slavery			??
Nebraska	Direct Election of Senators, Other			III
Texas	General and Unlimited Article V Convention	?		I
Minnesota	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		III
Pennsylvania	Direct Election of Senators, II	?		III
Idaho	Direct Election of President, Vice-President and Senators	?		III
Montana	Direct Election of Senators, II Direct Election of Senators, II	? ?		III
Oregon	Direct Election of Senators, Other Direct Election of Senators, I Direct Election of Senators, Other	? ? ?		III
Tennessee	Direct Election of Senators, II Direct Election of Senators, Other	? ?		III
Colorado	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		II
Michigan	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		III
Texas	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		II
Arkansas	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		III
Kentucky	Direct Election of Senators, II	?		III
Illinois	Direct Election of Senators, I Direct Election of Senators, Other	? ?		II
Nevada	Direct Election of Senators, II	?		III
Utah	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		III
Washington	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		II
Nebraska	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		III
Iowa	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		III
Missouri	Direct Election of Senators, II	?		III
South Dakota	Direct Election of Senators, Other Direct Election of Senators, I	? ?		III
Delaware	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Missouri	General and Unlimited Article V Convention	?		I
Indiana	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		II
Iowa	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		II
Nevada	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		II
New Jersey	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		III
Louisiana	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		II
Oklahoma	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		II
South Dakota	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Kansas	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		II
Wisconsin	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		III
Washington	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Montana	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		II
Maine	Direct Election of Senators, Other	?		III
Tennessee	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Montana	Anti-Polygamy	?	remainder of text	III
Nebraska	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Ohio	Anti-Polygamy	?	remainder of text	III
Illinois	Prevent and Suppress Monopolies	?		III
Wisconsin	General and Unlimited Article V Convention	?		I
California	Direct Election of Senators, I	?		??
Vermont	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Illinois	Anti-Polygamy	?	remainder of text	III
Oregon	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Wisconsin	Anti-Polygamy	?	remainder of text See, also,	III
Missouri	Supreme Court Jurisdiction	?		III
Michigan	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
South Carolina	Anti-Polygamy	?		III
Louisiana	Mode of Amendment, Other	?		??
Nevada	Anti-Prohibition	?		??
Wisconsin	Direct Election of President and VP	?
Wisconsin	General and Unlimited Article V Convention
Wisconsin	Article V Requirements Already Met for Convention Call	?
Wisconsin	Article V Requirements Already Met for Convention Call	?
Massachusetts	Anti-Prohibition	?		III
New York	Anti-Prohibition	?		IV
Wisconsin	Anti-Prohibition	?		III
New Jersey	Anti-Prohibition	?		III
California	Tax on Government Securities	?		III
California	Federal Labor Laws	?		III
Oregon	General Welfare Act of 1937	?		III
Wyoming	Income Tax, Limit II	?	remainder of text	III
Maryland	Income Tax, Limit II	?	appearing to have been approved only by the Maryland House of Delegates—and NOT at all by the Maryland Senate	III
Rhode Island	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
Iowa	Income Tax, Limit II	?		III
Maine	Income Tax, Limit I	?	remainder of text	III
Massachusetts	Income Tax, Limit I	?	remainder of text	III
Michigan	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
Iowa	Presidential Term Limits	?		III
Illinois	Presidential Term Limits	?	remainder of text	III
Michigan	Presidential Term Limits	?		III
New Hampshire	Income Tax, II	?	remainder of text	III
Delaware	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
Illinois	Income Tax, Limit II	?	remainder of text	III
Pennsylvania	Limited Funding Mandates, Various	?		III
Pennsylvania	Income Tax, Limit II	?	remainder of text	III
Wisconsin	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
Wisconsin	Presidential Term Limits	?		III
Kentucky	Income Tax, Limit I	?	remainder of text	III
New Jersey	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
California	World Federation	?	remainder of text	IV
New Jersey	World Federation	?		IV
North Carolina	World Federation	?	remainder of text	IV
Michigan	Revenue Sharing, II	?	remainder of text	IV
Florida	World Federation	?		III
Nebraska	Revenue Sharing, II	?	remainder of text	IV
Connecticut	World Federation	?		IV
Kansas	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
Iowa	Revenue Sharing, II	?	remainder of text	IV
Florida	Income Tax, Limit I	?	remainder of text	III
Maine	Revenue Sharing, II	?	remainder of text	IV
New Hampshire	Revenue Sharing, II	?	remainder of text	IV
Arkansas	Income Tax, Limit II	?		III
Utah	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
New Mexico	Revenue Sharing, II	?		IV
Georgia	Limited Treaty Powers, Various	?		III
Georgia	Income Tax, Limit I	?		III
Indiana	Income Tax, Limit II Income Tax, Limit II	? ?	remainder of text remainder of text	III III
Virginia	Income Tax, Limit I	?		~~III~~ 2004
California	Motor Vehicle Tax Distribution	?	remainder of text	III
Louisiana	Income Tax, Limit I	?	remainder of text	III
South Dakota	Mode of Amendment, Other Mode of Amendment, by 12 States Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	? ? ?	remainder of text remainder of text remainder of text	III III III
Illinois	Mode of Amendment, Other Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	? ?		III IV III
Georgia	School Management, States' Right School Management, States' Right School Management, States' Right	? ? ?		III
Texas	Mode of Amendment, by 12 States Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	? ?	remainder of text	III IV III
Oklahoma	Income Tax, Limit Other	?	remainder of text	III
Michigan	Mode of Amendment, by 12 States	?	remainder of text	IV
Idaho	Mode of Amendment, by 12 States	?	remainder of text	IV
Indiana	Mode of Amendment, by 12 States	?	remainder of text	IV
Indiana	Limited Treaty Powers, Various	?	remainder of text	III
Indiana	Proportional Electoral College, Other	?	remainder of text	III
Indiana	Repeal of Constitution's 16th Amendment	?	remainder of text	III
Indiana	Balanced Budget, Other Balanced Budget, Other	? ?	remainder of text	III III
Florida	Supreme Court Review, Other	?		III
Alabama	Judicial Term Limits	?		III
Connecticut	Prohibit Interstate Income Tax	?	remainder of text	III
Alabama	Limited Federal Preemption	?		III
Wyoming	Limit Federal Powers	?	remainder of text	III
Arkansas	Validity of 14th Amendment	?		III
Nevada	Limit Federal Powers	?		III
Louisiana	Limit Federal Powers	?		III
Arkansas	Supreme Court Review, Other	?		III
Wyoming	Balanced Budget, Other Balanced Budget, Emergency	? ?		III IV
Georgia	Supreme Court Review, Other	?		III
South Carolina	Limit Federal Powers	?		III
Oklahoma	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
Oklahoma	Apportionment of Legislature, I	?	remainder of text	III
Kansas	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
Kansas	Apportionment of Legislature, I	?		III
Florida	Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union	?	remainder of text	III
Florida	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
Idaho	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?		III
Arkansas	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
Arkansas	Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union	?	remainder of text	III
Arkansas	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?	remainder of text	III III
Arkansas	Proportional Electoral College, Other	?		III
South Dakota	Proportional Electoral College, Other	?		??
Montana	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?		III
Idaho	Balanced Budget, Other	?		III
Montana	Proportional Electoral College, I	?		III
Wyoming	Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union	?	remainder of text	III
Wyoming	Apportionment of Legislature, I	?		III
Wyoming	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
Alabama	Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union	?		III
Washington	Apportionment of Legislature, I	?		III
Missouri	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?		III III
Missouri	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
Utah	Proportional Electoral College, I	?		III
Colorado	Proportional Electoral College, I	?		III
Colorado	Income Tax, Limit Other	?		III
Nevada	Apportionment of Legislature, I	? ?		III
South Carolina	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?		III
South Carolina	Apportionment of Legislature, I	?		III
South Carolina	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
South Carolina	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		III
South Carolina	Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union	?	remainder of text	III
South Carolina	Supreme Court Review, Court of the Union	?	remainder of text	III
Texas	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?		III III
Texas	Proportional Electoral College, I	?	remainder of text	III
South Dakota	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?	remainder of text	III ~~III~~
Wisconsin	Proportional Electoral College, I	?		III
Virginia	Apportionment of Legislature, I Apportionment of Legislature, II	? ?	remainder of text	~~III~~ ~~III~~ 2004
Massachusetts	School Management, Other	?	appearing to have been approved only by the Massachusetts House of Representatives—and NOT at all by the Massachusetts Senate	III
Massachusetts	Senior Pensions	?		III
Virginia	Mode of Amendment, Identical Text	?		~~III~~ 2004
Louisiana	School Management, States' Right	?	remainder of text	III
Arizona	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Kansas	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?	remainder of text	III
South Carolina	School Management, States' Right	?		III
Utah	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Maryland	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
North Carolina	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Minnesota	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Oklahoma	Proportional Electoral College, I	?	also found at remainder of text	III
Louisiana	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
New Hampshire	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Illinois	Revenue Sharing, Other	?		III
Florida	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Mississippi	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Mississippi	School Management, States' Right	?	remainder of text	III
Mississippi	Anti-Subversion	?		III
Illinois	Apportionment of Legislature, II Apportionment of Legislature, Other			III III
Nebraska	Proportional Electoral College, I	?		III
Nebraska	Apportionment of Legislature, I	?		III
Ohio	Revenue Sharing, Other	?		III
Kentucky	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?	remainder of text	III
Alabama	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?	remainder of text	III
New Mexico	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Tennessee	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?	remainder of text	III
Illinois	Apportionment of Legislature, Other			III
Indiana	Apportionment of Legislature, II	?		III
Alabama	Revenue Sharing, Other	?	remainder of text	III
North Dakota	Apportionment of Legislature, Other	?		III
Georgia	Revenue Sharing, Other	?	remainder of text	III
Texas	Revenue Sharing, Other	?		III
Illinois	Revenue Sharing, Other	?	remainder of text	III
Iowa	Apportionment of Legislature, Other	?		III
Florida	Revenue Sharing, Other	?		III
New Hampshire	Revenue Sharing, I	?		III IV
Louisiana	Anti-Subversion	?	remainder of text	III
Louisiana	Income Tax, Limit Other	?		III
Louisiana	Revenue Sharing, Other	?		III
New Jersey	Revenue Sharing, I	?		IV
West Virginia	Revenue Sharing, I	?	remainder of text	IV
Massachusetts	Revenue Sharing, I	?		IV
South Dakota	Revenue Sharing, I	?		IV
North Dakota	Revenue Sharing, I	?		IV
Louisiana	Revenue Sharing, I	?	remainder of text	IV
Ohio	Revenue Sharing, I	?		IV
Delaware	Revenue Sharing, I	?		??
Oregon	Revenue Sharing, I	?		??
Massachusetts	School Management, Other School Management, Other	? ?	remainder of text	IV IV
Michigan	School Management, No Assignment	?	remainder of text	IV
Iowa	Revenue Sharing, I	?	remainder of text	IV
Florida	Senate Control of Presiding Officer	?		IV
Arizona	School Management, Prayer	?		III
Tennessee	School management, No Assignment	?		??
New York	School Management, Other	?	remainder of text	IV
Virginia	Balanced Federal Budget	? ? ?	remainder of text	~~III~~ IV ~~III~~ IV 2004
Mississippi	Prayer in Public Buildings	?		IV
Virginia	School management, No Assignment	?		?? 2004
New Jersey	School Management, Other	?		??
Texas	School Management, No Assignment	?		IV
Oklahoma	School Management, No Assignment	?		III
Maryland	School Management, Other	?		??
Nevada	School Management, No Assignment	?	remainder of text	IV
New Hampshire	School Management, Other	?		??
Arkansas	Balanced Federal Budget	? ?		III IV
Mississippi	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	III
Missouri	Right to Life, Various	?		III
Nevada	Limited Funding Mandates, Various	?		III
Louisiana	Balanced Federal Budget	? ? ?	remainder of text	III
Kentucky	School Management, No Assignment	?		III
Alabama	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Georgia	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Delaware	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
South Carolina	Balanced Federal Budget	? ?		IV IV
Massachusetts	School Management, No Assignment	?		III
Oklahoma	Limited Funding Mandates, Various	?		III
Louisiana	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Maryland	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	IV
Virginia	Line Item Veto, Various	?		?? 2004
New Jersey	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
South Dakota	Right to Life, Unborn Right to Life, Sacred Life	? ?		IV
Utah	Right to Life, Various	?	remainder of text	III
Arkansas	Right to Life, Various	?	remainder of text	IV
Rhode Island	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Texas	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	IV
Arizona	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	III
Massachusetts	Right to Life, Various	?		??
Indiana	Right to Life, Various	?		??
Colorado	Balanced Federal Budget	?		V
Nebraska	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Tennessee	Judicial Term Limits	?		III
Tennessee	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	III
Pennsylvania	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Oklahoma	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Kansas	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Delaware	Right to Life, Various	?		III
North Dakota	Balanced Federal Budget	?		II
North Carolina	Balanced Federal Budget	?		??
Mississippi	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Florida	Balanced Federal Budget	? ?	remainder of text	IV
Idaho	Balanced Federal Budget	?		V
New Mexico	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	IV
South Dakota	Balanced Federal Budget	?		V
Nebraska	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Georgia	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Utah	Balanced Federal Budget	?		III
Pennsylvania	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Oregon	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Indiana	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
New Hampshire	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Iowa	Balanced Federal Budget	?		IV
Nevada	Right to Life, Various	?		V
Nevada	Balanced Federal Budget	?	remainder of text	III
Idaho	Right to Life, Various	?		V
Oklahoma	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Tennessee	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Alabama	Right to Life, Various	?		IV
Arizona	Limited Funding Mandates, Various	?		III
North Dakota	Right to Life, Various	?		??
Alaska	Balanced Federal Budget	?		??
Missouri	Balanced Federal Budget	?		V
Arizona	Line Item Veto, Various	?		III
South Dakota	Line Item Veto, Various	?	remainder of text	V
Utah	Income Tax, Limit Other	?		III
South Dakota	Term Limits on Members of Congress	?	remainder of text	IV
Idaho	Income Tax, Limit Other	?		V
Georgia	Flag Desecration	?	remainder of text	IV
Colorado	Limited Funded Mandates, Various	?		V
South Dakota	Limited Funded Mandates, Various	?		V
Missouri	No Judicial Taxing Power	?		V
Delaware	Income Tax, Limit Other	?		IV
Missouri	Limited Funding Mandates, Various	?	remainder of text	V
Arizona	No Judicial Taxing Power	?	remainder of text	III
South Dakota	No Judicial Taxing Power	?		III
Nevada	Term Limits on Members of Congress	?		III
North Dakota	No Judicial Taxing Power	?	remainder of text	III
Louisiana	Posse Comitatus	?		IV
Florida	Balanced Federal Budget		remainder of text	V
Nebraska	Balanced Federal Budget			V
North Dakota	Mode of Amendment, Other			V
North Dakota	Increase in federal debt to require approval by majority of state legislatures			IV
Alabama	Balanced Federal Budget		remainder of text	V
Louisiana	Increase in federal debt to require approval by majority of state legislatures			IV
New Hampshire	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Ohio	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Georgia	Balanced Federal Budget		remainder of text	V
Georgia	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Michigan	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Tennessee	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Alaska	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Florida	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Florida	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Florida	Legislation in Congress to contain only one subject and that one subject must be clearly expressed in the measure's title			V
Vermont	Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission			V
Louisiana	Balanced Federal Budget			V
California	Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission			V
Illinois	Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission			V
South Dakota	Balanced Federal Budget			V
New Jersey	Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission			V
Utah	Balanced Federal Budget			V
North Dakota	Balanced Federal Budget		remainder of text	V
Alabama	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress		remainder of text	V
Tennessee	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Florida	Term limits on Members of Congress			V
Indiana	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
West Virginia	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Alaska	Countermand Amendment			V
Oklahoma	Combination of: Balanced Federal Budget; and Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress		remainder of text	V
Louisiana	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Rhode Island	Regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.	and	and remainder of text	V
Wyoming	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Arizona	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress		remainder of text	V
North Dakota	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Arizona	Balanced Federal Budget			V
Texas	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Missouri	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Wisconsin	Balanced Federal Budget		remainder of text''	V
Alabama	Term Limits on Members of Congress			V
Missouri	Term Limits on Members of Congress			V
Arkansas	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Utah	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress			V
Mississippi	Fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials—but specifically excluding the imposition of term limits upon members of Congress			V

Counts by states

In 1929 Wisconsin presented a list of states having made applications for a convention exceeding the two-thirds requirement that was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, with no further action. In 2013 states began listing existing state applications when joining them.

Wisconsin 1929

In 1929 Wisconsin applied to Congress to perform their constitutional duty to call a convention, listing Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin as states having made an application for a convention. There were 48 states in 1929, so 32 applications would be required to call a convention. 35 states were named.
Links to the text of applications by all states except California and North Carolina are provided in the table above. A reference to an application by California has been found in the congressional record and the text of an application by South Carolina is given in the table above. It may be that North Carolina was mistakenly included for South Carolina.
Three states, Missouri, Texas, and Wisconsin, had applied for a general convention. Eleven states listed had applied for a convention to prohibit polygamy, plus South Carolina. Idaho had included the direct election of the President and Vice President with their request for direct election of Senators. Thus 16 states clearly had outstanding applications.
Alabama and Georgia had outstanding issues from 1832 and 1833, making a less certain 18. Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Nevada, and Oklahoma would be added if we include class II requests for Direct Elections of Senators, for a total of 25.
The only known records for an application New York and Virginia are their ratification documents, before the Bill of Rights. New Jersey and Kentucky applied for a convention to prevent the Civil War, and class III applications for the Direct Election of Senators. Arkansas, Maine, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah only had documented class III applications for the Direct Election of Senators. California is most likely in this group. These ten states have applications that may have been mooted by amendments proposed by congress.

Balanced Budget

The balanced budget application of Ohio in 2013 through Arizona in 2017, except North Dakota, include a list of previous state applications for a balanced budget. Wisconsin's 2017 application also does not contain such a list. These lists mostly extend the previous lists, except possibly omitting state applications from the same legislative session.
Arizona has the most complete list, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. This represents 29 states.
Applications for all of the states mentioned above can be found in the list. Additionally, rescinded applications can be found for Delaware, Idaho, Oregon and Virginia. In particular, Delaware is included in lists prior to their rescission in 2016, but not after.
Wyoming and Wisconsin have made recent applications not included by Arizona, while Maryland, Nevada and New Mexico have recently rescinded their applications. This suggests a current total of 28 states, six short of the required 34.

Convention of States Resolution

The Convention of States Resolution includes fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limiting the terms of office of federal officials, including members of Congress. Oklahoma in 2016 and Texas in 2019 included counts of previous applications.
Texas has the most complete list, including the following 13 states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas.
All of these applications are included in the list, and Utah and Mississippi have recent applications not included by Texas, for a total of 15 states.

Wolf Pac Resolution

The Wolf Pac Resolution calls for regulation of election campaign donations and expenditures; end legal concept of "corporate personhood"; overturn 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Rhode Island included a count of the states in their 2016 application.
Rhode Island has the most complete list, including the following five states: California, Illinois, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Vermont. All of these applications are included in the list, with no recent additions.

Paulsen style application counts

holds that the applications for a convention alone should govern the convention. Thus, this section contains counts of applications based on groupings not excluded by the applications themselves.
Counts including class IV, V, or VI applications would be limited to those with the same description, and can be found by sorting the list by topic.

Class I and II Applications

Indiana, Missouri, Ohio, Texas, and Wisconsin have outstanding applications for a convention to propose amendments, with no accompanying issue.
Alabama has a request for a convention limiting tariffs, and South Carolina one for clarification on Amendment X, each implying that other amendments may be considered.

Class I, II, and III Applications

24 more states have outstanding class III applications. These are Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington.
This gives a total of 31 states with known class I, II, or III applications. Three more application would meet the 2/3 requirement to call a convention.

Brennan style application counts

holds that, in 1982, it was necessary, desirable, and feasible to hold a convention. He lists the following counts in the introduction to his claim:

450 applications through 1980, plus 25 more since 1980, gives 475 total applications
Applications from every state in the union
36 states with more than six or more separate applications

Popular movies

The Hunger Games (film) - 2012 American dystopian action thriller science fiction-adventure film directed by Gary Ross and based on Suzanne Collins’s 2008 novel of the same name. It is the first insta...
untitled Captain Marvel sequel - part of Marvel Cinematic Universe....
Killers of the Flower Moon (film project) - Killers of the Flower Moon - film project in United States of America. It was presented as drama, detective fiction, thriller. The film project starred Leonardo Dicaprio, Robert De Niro. Director of...
Five Nights at Freddy's (film) - Five Nights at Freddy's - film published in 2017 in United States of America. Scenarist of the film - Scott Cawthon....

Popular books

Book of Revelation - The Book of Revelation is the final book of the New Testament, and consequently is also the final book of the Christian Bible. Its title is derived from the first word of the Koine Greek text: apok...
Book of Genesis - account of the creation of the world, the early history of humanity, Israel's ancestors and the origins...
Gospel of Matthew - The Gospel According to Matthew is the first book of the New Testament and one of the three synoptic gospels. It tells how Israel's Messiah, rejected and executed in Israel, pronounces judgement on ...
Michelin Guide - Michelin Guides are a series of guide books published by the French tyre company Michelin for more than a century. The term normally refers to the annually published Michelin Red Guide , the oldest...
Psalms - The Book of Psalms , commonly referred to simply as Psalms , the Psalter or "the Psalms", is the first book of the Ketuvim , the third section of the Hebrew Bible, and thus a book of th...
Ecclesiastes - Ecclesiastes is one of 24 books of the Tanakh , where it is classified as one of the Ketuvim . Originally written c. 450–200 BCE, it is also among the canonical Wisdom literature of the Old Tes...
The 48 Laws of Power - non-fiction book by American author Robert Greene. The book...

Popular television series

The Crown (TV series) - historical drama web television series about the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, created and principally written by Peter Morgan, and produced by Left Bank Pictures and Sony Pictures Tel...
Friends - American sitcom television series, created by David Crane and Marta Kauffman, which aired on NBC from September 22, 1994, to May 6, 2004, lasting ten seasons. With an ensemble cast sta...
Young Sheldon - spin-off prequel to The Big Bang Theory and begins with the character Sheldon...
Modern Family - American television mockumentary family sitcom created by Christopher Lloyd and Steven Levitan for the American Broadcasting Company. It ran for eleven seasons, from September 23...
Loki (TV series) - upcoming American web television miniseries created for Disney+ by Michael Waldron, based on the Marvel Comics character of the same name. It is set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, shar...
Game of Thrones - American fantasy drama television series created by David Benioff and D. B. Weiss for HBO. It...
Shameless (American TV series) - American comedy-drama television series developed by John Wells which debuted on Showtime on January 9, 2011. It...