Leiden Riddle


The "Leiden Riddle" is an Old English riddle. It is noteworthy for being one of the earliest attested pieces of English poetry; one of only a small number of representatives of the Northumbrian dialect of Old English; one of only a relatively small number of Old English poems to survive in multiple manuscripts; and evidence for the translation of the Latin poetry of Aldhelm into Old English.

Text

Aldhelm’s LoricaThe Leiden Riddle Exeter Book Riddle 33/35

The damp earth produced me from her cold womb; I am not made from the rasping fleece of wool, no leashes pull nor garrulous threads reverberate, nor do Oriental worms weave with yellow down, nor am I plucked by shuttles nor beaten by the hard reed; and yet I will be called a coat in the common speech. I do not fear arrows pulled out from long quivers.		The wet ground, incredibly cold, first produced me from its innards. I do not know myself in my mind's considerations to be made with wool from fleeces, from hair through great skill. There are no woofs woven in me, nor do I have warps, nor does thread resound in me through the thrusting of pressers, nor do whizzing shuttles shake in me, nor must the sley knock me anywhere. Worms did not weave me with the skills of the fates, those which adorn the costly yellow cloth with decorations. But nevertheless, widely across the earth, I am wont to be called desirable clothing amongst heroes. Nor do I dread terror from the peril of a flight of arrows, though it might be taken eagerly from the quivers.The wet ground, incredibly cold, first produced me from its innards. I do not know myself in my mind's considerations to be made with wool from fleeces, from hair through great skill. There are no woofs woven in me, nor do I have warps, nor does thread resound in me through the thrustings of pressers, nor does whizzing shuttle glide in me, nor must the sley knock me anywhere. Worms did not weave me with the skills of the fates, those which adorn the costly yellow cloth with decorations. But nevertheless, widely across the earth, I am wont to be called desirable clothing amongst heroes. Person clever in your ideas, wise in your words, say in truthful utterance what this clothing might be.

Manuscript

The Leiden Riddle is attested in MS Leiden, Bibliotheek der Rijksuniversiteit, Voccius Lat. 4o 106, where it accompanies the Latin text on which it is based. The manuscript was described by Herbert Dean Merritt thus:
The manuscript was probably copied in western France, perhaps at Fleury Abbey. The riddle was added after the completion of the main contents, fairly certainly at Fleury Abbey, in the tenth century, but the language of the text is older, of the eighth century. It was already hard to read by the earlier nineteenth century, and was further damaged by the librarian, Willem George Pluygers, who in 1864 applied reagents to the text in an attempt to make it more legible.

Literary origins and character of the text

The West Saxon aristocrat, monk, scholar, and poet Aldhelm composed, among many other works, a set of one hundred hexametrical 'enigmata' or 'enigmas', inspired by the so-called Riddles of Symphosius. The thirty-third was Lorica. This was translated into Old English, and first witnessed in the Northumbrian dialect of Old English as the Leiden Riddle; the language is of the seventh or eighth century. Unusually, the riddle is also attested, in West Saxon, among the Old English riddles of the later tenth-century Exeter Book, where it is number 33 or 35. Apart from differences in language caused by dialect and date, and damage to the Leiden manuscript, the texts are the identical on all but a couple of points.
The translation has been praised for its complexity and wit. In the assessment of Thomas Klein,

Linguistic origins and character of the text

The Leiden Riddle is an unusually archaic example of Old English, and one of relatively few representatives of its Northumbrian dialect. This is easily shown through comparison between the Leiden Riddle and the later, West Saxon copy in the Exeter Book:
The differences between these two copies are ample testament to the distances in time and space that separate them. Several are relatively superficial, representing different conventions for the spelling of what was in fact the same sound: eg. Leiden's typically early ⟨u⟩, ⟨th⟩ and ⟨b⟩, frequently appearing for Exeter ⟨w⟩, ⟨þ⟩ and ⟨f⟩. Reflecting a distinct pronunciation are the Leiden forms ueta, herum and auefun, whose ⟨e⟩ versus Exeter ⟨æ⟩ represents one of the most important dialect divisions between West Saxon and Anglian; similarly significant are the vowels in, e.g., Leiden heh rather than heah, uarp as opposed to wearp, biað next to beoð, and so on. In general, there is a far greater range of unaccented vowels in Leiden, another feature of an early date with innaðe, hlimmith ; and some important differences in inflexional endings.

Recordings