Lake Turkana Wind Power Station
Lake Turkana Wind Power Project is the single largest private investment in Kenya’s history. The wind farm covers and is located in Loiyangalani District, in Marsabit County, approximately, by road, north of Nairobi, Kenya's capital city.
The KSh70 billion wind farm has a capacity of 310 MW, enough to supply one million homes. It comprises 365 wind turbines, each with a capacity of 850 kilowatts; the associated overhead electric grid distribution system and a high voltage substation that connect it to the national grid. The power produced is bought at a fixed price by Kenya Power over a 20-year period in accordance with the Power Purchase Agreement with the latter. The project was completed in January 2017, however the line evacuating the power generated was not completed until July 2019.
Location
The wind farm is located approximately, north of the town of South Horr, in Loyangalani sub-county, in the extreme western part of Marsabit County, in the former Eastern Province. This location lies approximately, by road, west of Marsabit, where the county headquarters are located. The geographical coordinates of the wind farm are: 02°30'44.0"N, 36°49'00.0"E. The wind is strongest in the morning and in October, and weakest in the afternoon and in February, contrasting with Ngong Hills Wind Power Station.The project is on trust land owned by local authorities, used by indigenous pastoralists. This means that all the land is held by the relevant local authority, ostensibly in trust for the local inhabitants. The tribes that communally use land in this area include El Molo, Rendille, Samburu, Turkana and other indigenous and pastoralist communities in the South-East of Marsabit County.
Specification
The wind farm site, covers approximately. The farm has 365 turbines, each with capacity of 850 kW. The V52 had gone out of production, but was updated with nested towers for transport on the road from Mombasa port, of which are new gravel roads.The power generated from the wind turbines will be transmitted via 33 kV overhead electric wires to a substation which will be located on the premises. From the substation, power will be transmitted via a 400 kV high voltage electric power lines to a substation in Suswa, approximately , south of Loyangalani, where it will be integrated into the national power grid. The electricity will be bought by Kenya Power Company at a fixed price for 20 years from the time of commissioning. As part of the development, the road from Laisamis to the project site, a distance of approximately, is slated to be upgraded. Construction began in 2015 and full operation is expected to commence in 2018. As of April 2015, construction had begun. The first 90 MW was expected online in October 2016 with full commissioning of the full 300 MW planned for July 2017.
History
LTWP was created in 2006 out of the partnering of Anset Africa Limited and KP&P. In 2005, discussions with the Kenyan government began regarding the development of a wind power project near to Lake Turkana and as a result, extensive wind assessments were conducted. Later in 2007 environmental fieldwork was undertaken. A Memorandum of Understanding was signed between LTWP and Kenya Power on 10 April 2008. Land permits IR Number 6395/1 and IR Number 6396/1 were signed with the Kenyan government in March 2009, which caused problems when local communities only came to know the plans in April 2014. Construction began in October 2014 and was expected to be completed in June 2017. In March 2016, the first shipment of 30 wind turbines arrived in the country, in anticipation of the first 50 MW coming online in September 2016. At 9 March 2017, Lake Turkana Wind Power Station was ready to produce 33% of the targeted of 310 MW. At that time, all 365 wind turbines had been erected.On 19 July 2019, Uhuru Kenyatta, the president of Kenya, officially commissioned the, 400kV Loiyangalani-Suswa High Voltage Power Line that transmits the generated power for integration into the national grid. At that time, the power station was averaging generation of 199 megawatts.
Developers and funding
The company that owns and is developing the wind farm is called Lake Turkana Wind Power Limited. The consortium which owns LTWP Limited includes the following entities:; Equity partners
In February 2020, it became public that Google Inc. would not become an investor in the project. Vestas, the Danish turbine supplier, which owns 12.5 percent of the holding company, said in Danish media that delays in completing the high voltage transmission line led to the cancellation of the transfer contract in 2019.
;Financial partners
The lead arranger for the US$853.12 million syndicated financing package is the African Development Bank, with Standard Bank and Nedbank Capital of South Africa as co-arrangers. The following have provided financing to the project.
;Donors
The following entities made outright donations to the project:
- Government of the Netherlands - €10 million
- EU Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund - €25 million.
Transmission line and substation
- A 'concessional loan' of €55 million at an interest of 0.10 per cent, with a repayment period of 30 years, including a 14-year grace period. The loan will be supported by a 'Financial Co-operation Agreement' between Kenya’s Ministry of Finance and Spain’s Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade;
- €55 million in 'commercial credit' with support from the :es:CESCE|Spanish Export Credit Insurance Company on OECD terms;
- A 'sovereign guarantee' by the Kenyan Government.
World Bank pulls out of project
LTWP suffered a setback in 2012 when the World Bank withdrew its support for the project. Bank officials were reported to have concerns that the electricity produced would outweigh demand. The World Bank Group’s country director in Kenya, Johannes Zutt, stated that Kenya could be left with excess power on the grid worth up to KSh8.5 billion per year. Originally, the project was expected to be fully operational by the end of 2014. From the project perspective, the withdrawal of the World Bank could be seen in a positive light as it allowed LTWP to move forward to financial close. A source at power transmission firm Ketraco indicated that the agency was happy with the World Bank’s decision to quit. "We are happy that the World Bank has withdrawn. They were putting a lot of hurdles in our way but now we can go ahead."Economic impacts
LTWP will be the largest single private investment in Kenya at the time it is made. LTWP claims the wind farm will reduce and possibly eliminate Kenya's dependency on diesel and heavy fuel power stations, however, this claim is unsubstantiated. Fuel imports to power thermal power stations, cost the Kenyan taxpayer US$150 million annually. It is anticipated that the project will contribute KES:3 billion annually, and KES:58.6 billion, in tax revenue over a period 20 years. During construction, approximately 2,500 workers will be hired. Once commissioned, the power station will employ 200 full-time staff.Impacts on Kenyan State and consumers
The Project is of significant strategic benefit to Kenya, and at Ksh70 billion will be the largest single private investment in Kenya’s history. With a power tariff of Euro 7.52 cents per kWh, LTWP is one of the lowest power tariffs in Kenya along with geothermal power. It is estimated that Kenya will save up to $120 million a year in fuel cost by reducing reliance on diesel power plants.LTWP’s contract with government-owned Kenya Power obliges the utility to buy all electricity produced by the wind farm, even if it is not needed, or if more economic electricity sources are available; "The power produced will be bought at a fixed price by Kenya Power over a 20-year period in accordance with the signed Power Purchase Agreement."
Furthermore, the Kenyan Government has signed guarantees with LTWP to cover costs in case Kenya Power cannot afford to pay for excess electricity for the duration of the PPA. In order to mitigate this risk the African Development Fund has provided a 'partial risk guarantee' up to the value of €20 million. The Kenyan Government is also liable for losses incurred by delay due to political causes or project failure. These costs, as well as the expenses for the transmission line, are therefore likely to be passed on to Kenyan taxpayers and electricity consumers on top of the electricity produced and result in higher prices for electricity users than current rates.
Grid stability
The LTWP project is of such a large scale that it will provide up to 20% of the Kenyan power grid’s capacity to absorb wind energy.It is generally accepted in wind technology research that intermittent resources can destabilise a small grid such as that in Kenya, especially if it is concentrated all in one location. Denmark has over 19% wind power connected to the grid, but this capacity is supplied across thousands of projects. While LTWP aims to provide 310 MW of reliable, low cost wind power to the Kenya national grid, equivalent to approximately 18% of Kenya’ current installed electricity generating capacity, Currently,Kenya has a total installed capacity of 2300 MW, largely being generated by hydro and thermal. The Government targets to increase generating capacity to 6762 MW in 2017. Kenya also plans to change the energy generation mix, with a view of reducing dependency on hydro and thermal. LTWP will play a key role in balancing the energy generation mix.
Meru High Court lawsuit
Local Turkana communities filed a lawsuit against LTWP in October 2014 at Meru High Court, Kenya to nullify the titles obtained by the company and return the land to its original status as community land. Sagana, Biriq & Company represented the communities in the court case. In November 2016 Justice Peter Njoroge of the Meru High Court rejected the application filed by Marsabit residents, requesting the court to stop the Wind Power project.Criticisms
Indigenous rights issues
LTWP commenced its community engagement activities in 2005, nine years before construction started in October 2014.Social and Environmental Impacts
Negative social and environmental impacts have also been highlighted in LTWP’s own Environmental and Social Impact Assessment which would have serious implications for the social, cultural, economic and political well-being of the communities affected.LTWP documents detail plans for the construction of a new "camp" for 2,500 construction site workers. LTWP states that these workers will be employed local workers, trained for the job. However, this part of Northern Kenya lacks enough people to provide the labour so LTWP will need to employ most of these workers from outside the local area.
According to the ESIA, there are a number of potential negative local impacts due to the arrival of the 2,500 workers, and the construction work in general. These include: cultural contamination; increased risk of HIV/AIDS, malaria and bilzharia; increased insecurity and community conflicts; challenges of labour force management; increased accidents and occupational hazards; increase in antisocial behavior such as theft, alcohol consumption, production of illegal brews, and the introduction of commercial sex; long-term erosion of normal community life; increased demand for wood resources in an area with an already "acute shortage"; sanitation and waste disposal problems; decreased livestock grazing area.
However, the project's positive social impacts have outweighed the negative ones and the project continues to share project benefits with the local communities through its Winds of Change Foundation. Some locals were informed about the project in 2007, while others expressed a lack of information. 1180 people of the Sarima village were relocated and compensated with KSh13,000, while Samburu people expressed appreciation of the project.
Sarima Indigenous Peoples' Land Forum
In February 2015, the intertribal Sarima Indigenous Peoples’ Land Forum was created as an attempt to bring indigenous communities together in order to stop the wind power project. The Forum is named after the village of Sarima that is to be displaced by the project. In their Declaration of 7th February 2015 the SIPLF states:The SIPLF are not against wind farm development, if there are benefits seen:
Contrary to documents produced by LTWP about the cultural sensitivity of the project, SIPLF claims that "LTWP representatives have expressed, in actions and words, their complete contempt for our region and for our communities’ rich environment and cultures." Carlo Van Wageningen, one of the founders of LTWP, expressed this poor perception in eloquent terms:
"If you were to see some of the images of our wind site, of our site, I would say it reminds me of the pictures I used to see of the moon. Every hill is a crater, it’s old lava flows and lava rock everywhere, and it is very windy. There is absolutely nothing there, there is no infrastructure, there are no electrical connections, there are no roads, there is no way to host anyone unless you put them in a tent, so we have to build everything."
Further evidence of this attitude is provided by a Mr. Parker in a May 2015 Wall Street Journal article; "You are at a huge distance from civilization…" he said. SIPLF have not been active since February 2015.
Capacity charge
In August 2017, the Daily Nation reported that the owners of this power station had, in January 2017, started to bill the Kenya Power Company a monthly "capacity charge" of KSh700 million, for power produced by the power station that cannot be evacuated due to lack a high voltage line to transmit it to the substation at Suswa. Following negotiations, in September 2017, the government of Kenya agreed to pay the developers of Lake Turkana Wind Power station, a total of Sh5.7 billion, in monthly installments, spread over a six year period. The monthly payment will amount to Sh78,600,000. The monthly surcharge will be passed on to the consumers, beginning in May 2018, when the high-voltage power line is expected to be completed.The transmission line was completed and connected to the national grid on 24 September 2018. The delays attracted total penalties of €127 million. In a deal struck in 2017, Kenya committed to pay €46 million of the total penalty in lump sum, while the balance of €81 million was to be paid over a period of six years through a tariff increase to the electricity consumers.