The L&YR 2-10-0 was a prospective design for a class of 2-10-0 steam locomotives on the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway. Initial designs were made by George Hughes between 1913–1914, but none of the class were built. If they had been, these would have been the UK's first 10-coupled locomotives in regular service.
Background
Locomotives with ten driving wheels were rare in British railway history. One specialist exception, the GER Decapod, had been built in 1902, but the main heavy mineral locomotive design was the 0-8-0, on both the L&YR and the LNWR. Train weights were increasing though and there was some demand for a more powerful locomotive, particularly for the steep gradients across the Pennines from the Lancashire Coalfield to the port of Goole. It was felt that a more powerful single locomotive would avoid the need for double-heading on coal trains. In August 1913, John Aspinall was on holiday in the spa and railway town of Bad Homburg, Germany. Impressed by the capacity of the new Prussian G 10 0-10-0 heavy freight locomotives, Aspinall wrote to Hughes requesting a report on the extent of double-heading for the trans-Pennine coal traffic, which Hughes provided in September. Inspired by recent work in Belgium, which had shown savings of 19% in coal consumption by avoiding it, Hughes suggested the use of a single large locomotive, emphasised the need to use it at full capacity and also rejected a proposed concept for a 2-8-2 in favour of a 2-10-0.
Concept
At the Brussels International exhibition of 1910 the Belgian engineer exhibited his new Type 10 pacific, the most powerful European locomotive of the time. This was a four-cylinder superheated passenger locomotive with a distinctive tapered boiler of Flamme's design. Flamme used the large Belgian loading gauge to its most and made the round-topped boiler particularly high. The tapered section ahead of the firebox reduced to a boiler barrel which allowed enough height above for the steam dome. Hughes had been influenced by Flamme, by his views on superheating and on the testing of locomotives by the use of dynamometer cars. Flamme's design had the novel feature of a mechanical integrator to calculate drawbar horsepower-hours directly. He was encouraged to build such a car for the L&YR. In 1911 a party of senior L&YR officials from Horwich had visited Flamme in Belgium. They were particularly interested in the Type 10 and also the related 2-10-0. These two designs shared the same boiler. The L&YR had little use for such a powerful passenger locomotive, but the 2-10-0 was of great interest. The 2-10-0 was of conventional layout, with the two rear driving axles set beneath the firebox grate and ashpan. The pacific though, with the same boiler, required its higher axles to be placed ahead of the firebox. This required a carrying axle below the firebox and also placed the four cylinders ahead of the smokebox, beneath a prominent flat platform.
Design
Hughes' first design proposal in September 1913 put forward a number of principles. None of these were radical, but they represented the best features of British locomotive design at the time, together with Flamme's influence. Although Horwich would later be overshadowed by :en:William Stanier|Stanier's work during the LMS period, at this time they considered themselves to be one of the leading British locomotive designers.
Superheating, a developing practice at the time, which Hughes had experience of with smaller classes, although the valve and lubrication problems were still an issue. The use of piston valves was a response to this, their piston ring sealing working better at these increased steam temperatures than the flat faces of slide valves had done.
Despite this being the era for the adoption of the Belpaire firebox, which Hughes had introduced on his other designs and rebuilding work, Flamme now considered it 'obsolete'. Flamme's new design was for a round-topped firebox of the maximum possible size, and with radial firebox stays rather than the older and troublesome girder stays. The tapered rear ring of the boiler allowed the highest firebox to be used with a practical diameter of boiler, even though the British loading gauge meant that there could be no dome.
Flexible wheelbase
Alloy steels, with nickel and chromium additives, were in development at this time and they were to be used for the most highly stressed parts of the motion.
An initial design for a four-cylinder 2-10-0 was produced. An outline drawing, dated 18 June 1914, is shown in. The calculated tractive effort of would be exceptional for this time; the contemporary Class 31 0-8-0 was only in comparison. Hughes' design was strongly influenced by Flamme's, particularly for its boiler. The round-topped boiler almost filled the loading gauge, with the firebox wrapper the height of the cab. Even though it was also tapered, the boiler had to be domeless, owing to the lack of clearance and even the safety valves had to be moved to the side, rather than the usual position on top. The boiler pressure was lowered from 200 to 180 psi, but the slightly smaller wheels kept the tractive effort high. The large grate area of would have provided adequate evaporative capacity, but would also have been a challenge for the fireman. The cylinders were directly below the smokebox and moderately inclined, with all four cylinders driving on the third axle. The crosshead was, unusually, a single bar type. Walschaerts valve gear was used. The piston rods are particularly long, allowing space for a rocker arm on the valve rods, between the valve chest and the combination lever, to drive the inner valves. The front carrying axle was simplified to a conventional Bissell truck, carried on a long radius pivot under the first driven axle, of almost. The two rear driving axles were beneath the ashpan, although this early design does not make it clear how the small space here was managed. The Dreadnoughts had already suffered from a lack of air supply here. Owing to the length of the locomotive, the tender was kept to a short 6-wheeled pattern, rather than the existing 8-wheeled designs of the 0-8-0 locomotives, so that the overall locomotive would still fit onto existing turntables. This was taller though, so its capacity was increased from 5 tons and 3,600 gallons to 6 tons and 4,500 gallons. Despite this increase, it was still described as looking like "an elephant harnessed to a hand-cart". The outbreak of the Great War only a month after this drawing meant that there was no longer time for new speculative designs, and so none were built. Its effects also prevented Hughes from the much-needed rebuilding work on the Dreadnoughts.
Post-War
In 1923, just after the Grouping, a series of new designs were drawn up at Horwich in an attempt to set the direction of future locomotive development, rather than the Crewe or Derby influences. John Billington worked on a wide-firebox pacific based on the newly rebuilt 4-6-0 Dreadnoughts, a new 2-8-2 heavy freight locomotive and also a 4-cylinder 2-10-0, based on Hughes' Flamme-inspired design. These designs were not well received by the new LMS directors at Euston, and Horwich would produce few influential designs thereafter. The 2-10-0 in particular, and its long wheelbase, was opposed by the civil engineering department.
