All Hatiora species are found as epiphytes growing on trees or lithophytes growing on rocks. They are found in the tropical rainforests of the Mata Atlântica in eastern Brazil. The plants are weakly succulent, growing more or less upright and becomingwoody at the base when older. Spines are usually missing. The insect-pollinated flowers are borne terminally. They are small, with a diameter of about, actinomorphic, bell-shaped and always coloured. The fruit is a berry. By contrast with species of the genus Schlumbergera, most of which have flattened stems, Hatiora species have stems with a circular cross-section.
Taxonomy
Cacti belonging to the tribe Rhipsalideae are quite distinct in appearance and habit from other cacti, as they grow on trees or rocks as epiphytes or lithophytes. However, for a long time there has been confusion as to how the rhipsalid species should be divided into genera. In 1819, Haworth described the first discovered species of the modern genus Hatiora under the name Rhipsalis salicornioides. In 1834, A.P. de Candolle recognized the distinctness of this species and transferred it to a new genus Hariota, named after Thomas Hariot, a 16th-century botanist. Later a second species, H. gaertneri, was initially named as Epiphyllum russellianum var. gaertneri and then in 1889 as Epiphyllum gaertneri. A third species, H. rosea, was described in 1912 as Rhipsalis rosea. By 1923, many nomenclatural uncertainties and confusion had arisen over the name Hariota. Nathaniel Britton and Joseph Rose created a new name Hatiora as a taxonomic anagram of Hariota. Of the species known at the time, they placed Hariota salicornioides in Hatiora along with H. cylindrica; they had already placed H. gaertneri in Schlumbergera in 1913 and left it there; and they erected a new genus, Rhipsalidopsis, for H. rosea. Two further species which have been assigned to Hatiora were placed in various genera, including the original Hariota and Rhipsalis. According to Anderson, the confusion among the Rhipsalideae was not clarified until work by Wilhelm Barthlott and Nigel Taylor in 1995, which placed six species in Hatiora, divided between two subgenera. Phylogenetic studies using DNA have led to a modification of the Barthlott and Taylor classification and the three species of Hatiora they placed in subgenus Rhipsalidopsis have been transferred out of the genus. There is agreement that Hatiora epiphylloides should be placed in Schlumbergera. There is disagreement over the other two species. Some sources also include them in a broadly defined Schlumbergera, others place them as the only two species in the genus Rhipsalidopsis. Hatiora and the most broadly circumscribedSchlumbergera both branch from the tip and have short segments. Hatiora has stems that are round in cross-section and radially symmetrical flowers, whereas Schlumbergera has flattened or otherwise angular stems and its flowers may be radially symmetrical or radially unsymmetrical.
Subgeneric classification and species
In the taxonomic treatments of the genus by Barthlott & Taylor and Hunt, Hatiora was divided into two subgenera with six accepted species, plus a hybrid created in cultivation. Subgenus Rhipsalidopsis has subsequently been removed from Hatiora.
Subgenus Hatiora, now comprising all of Hatiora
*Hatiora cylindrica Britton & Rose
*Hatiora herminiae Backeb. ex Barthlott
*Hatiora salicornioides Britton & Rose ex L.H.Bailey
Subgenus Rhipsalidopsis, either transferred to Schlumbergera or split between Schlumbergera and Rhipsalidopsis
*Hatiora gaertneri Barthlott = Schlumbergera gaertneri or Rhipsalidopsis gaertneri
*Hatiora rosea Barthlott = Schlumbergera rosea or Rhipsalidopsis rosea
*Hatiora × graeseri Barthlott ex D.R.Hunt = Schlumbergera × graeseri or Rhipsalidopsis × graeseri, an artificial hybrid of Schlumbergera gaertneri and Schlumbergera rosea