This formulation is from Titchmarsh. Suppose an ≥ 0 for all n, and as x ↑1 we have Then as ngoes to ∞ we have The theorem is sometimes quoted in equivalent forms, where instead of requiring an ≥ 0, we require an = O, or we require an ≥ −K for some constantK. The theorem is sometimes quoted in another equivalent formulation. If, as y ↓ 0, then
Integral formulation
The following more general formulation is from Feller. Consider a real-valued functionF : 0,∞) → R of [bounded variation. The Laplace–Stieltjes transform of F is defined by the Stieltjes integral The theorem relates the asymptotics of ω with those of F in the following way. If ρ is a non-negative real number, then the following statements are equivalent Here Γ denotes the Gamma function. One obtains the theorem for series as a special case by taking ρ = 1 and F to be a piecewise constant function with value between t=n and t=n+1. A slight improvement is possible. According to the definition of a slowly varying function, L is slow varying at infinity iff for every positive t. Let L be a function slowly varying at infinity and ρ a non-negative real number. Then the following statements are equivalent
Karamata's proof
found a short proof of the theorem by considering the functions g such that An easy calculation shows that all monomials g=xk have this property, and therefore so do all polynomials g. This can be extended to a function g with simple discontinuities by approximating it by polynomials from above and below and using the fact that the coefficients an are positive. In particular the function given by g=1/t if 1/e<t<1 and 0 otherwise has this property. But then for x=e−1/Nthe sum Σanxng is a0+...+aN, and the integral of g is 1, from which the Hardy–Littlewood theorem follows immediately.
Examples
Non-positive coefficients
The theorem can fail without the condition that the coefficients are non-negative. For example, the function is asymptotic to 1/4 as x tends to 1, but the partial sums of its coefficients are 1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, 4... and are not asymptotic to any linear function.
In 1911 Littlewood proved an extension of Tauber's converse of Abel's theorem. Littlewood showed the following: If an = O, and as x ↑ 1 we have then This came historically before the Hardy–Littlewood tauberian theorem, but can be proved as a simple application of it.
In 1915 Hardy and Littlewood developed a proof of the prime number theorem based on their tauberian theorem; they proved where Λ is the von Mangoldt function, and then conclude an equivalent form of the prime number theorem. Littlewood developed a simpler proof, still based on this tauberian theorem, in 1971.