H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004


The H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004 was a part of Title IV of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 in the United States that focused on changes to regulations governing H-1B visas. It was a successor to previous legislative changes affecting the H-1B, namely: the Immigration Act of 1990, American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998, and the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000. The Consolidated Appropriations Act was signed by George W. Bush, then President of the United States, in early December 2004.
Title IV of the Consolidated Appropriations Act had another component pertaining to immigration regulations, namely the L-1 Visa Reform Act of 2004, that pertained to L-1 visas.

Provisions

Addition of some cap-exempt slots for people with graduate degrees

Prior to this Act, there were 195,000 slots available under the annual H-1B cap. Nonprofit research institutions were exempt from the cap, and people who had been counted towards the cap already could apply without being counted against the cap as long as they weren't going over their 6-year limit.
The H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004 effectively reduced the cap from 195,000 to 65,000 visas, but declaring exemptions for the first 20,000 applicants each year with graduate degrees. Specifically:
The fee structure was changed as follows:
The Labor Condition Application attestations that were introduced for H-1B-dependent employers and those who had committed willful misrepresentations recently were renewed. These attestations continue to be required as of 2015.

Elimination of the "95% rule" for the prevailing wage requirement

The "95% rule" for prevailing wages, where employers needed to pay only 95% or more of the prevailing wage, was eliminated: employers were now required to pay at least 100% of the prevailing wage.

Changes to Department of Labor investigative authority

The DOL was given authority to investigate when the Secretary of Labor personally certifies that there is reasonable cause to believe that the employer is not in compliance and authorizes the investigation, or when a credible source provides information that includes
allegations that within the past 12 months an employer has willfully failed to meet an LCA condition, has engaged in a pattern or practice of violations, or has committed a substantial failure to meet an LCA condition that affects multiple employees.

Formal lines of defense for employers

Employers were given two recognized, standard lines of defense they could use in case of any investigation or identification of problems with their applications: