Hölder's inequality
In mathematical analysis, Hölder's inequality, named after Otto Hölder, is a fundamental inequality between integrals and an indispensable tool for the study of spaces.
The numbers and above are said to be Hölder conjugates of each other. The special case gives a form of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Hölder's inequality holds even if is infinite, the right-hand side also being infinite in that case. Conversely, if is in and is in, then the pointwise product is in.
Hölder's inequality is used to prove the Minkowski inequality, which is the triangle inequality in the space, and also to establish that is the dual space of for .
Hölder's inequality was first found by Leonard James Rogers, and discovered independently by.
Remarks
Conventions
The brief statement of Hölder's inequality uses some conventions.- In the definition of Hölder conjugates, means zero.
- If , then and stand for the expressions
- If, then stands for the essential supremum of, similarly for.
- The notation with is a slight abuse, because in general it is only a norm of if is finite and is considered as equivalence class of -almost everywhere equal functions. If and, then the notation is adequate.
- On the right-hand side of Hölder's inequality, 0 × ∞ as well as ∞ × 0 means 0. Multiplying with ∞ gives ∞.
Estimates for integrable products
and the similar one for hold, and Hölder's inequality can be applied to the right-hand side. In particular, if and are in the Hilbert space, then Hölder's inequality for implies
where the angle brackets refer to the inner product of. This is also called Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, but requires for its statement that and are finite to make sure that the inner product of and is well defined. We may recover the original inequality by using the functions and in place of and.
Generalization for probability measures
If is a probability space, then just need to satisfy, rather than being Hölder conjugates. A combination of Hölder's inequality and Jensen's inequality implies thatfor all measurable real- or complex-valued functions and on .
Notable special cases
For the following cases assume that and are in the open interval with.Counting measure
For the -dimensional Euclidean space, when the set is with the counting measure, we haveIf with the counting measure, then we get Hölder's inequality for sequence spaces:
Lebesgue measure
If is a measurable subset of with the Lebesgue measure, and and are measurable real- or complex-valued functions on , then Hölder inequality isProbability measure
For the probability space let denote the expectation operator. For real- or complex-valued random variables and on Hölder's inequality readsLet and define Then is the Hölder conjugate of Applying Hölder's inequality to the random variables and we obtain
In particular, if the th absolute moment is finite, then the th absolute moment is finite, too.
Product measure
For two σ-finite measure spaces and define the product measure space bywhere is the Cartesian product of and, the arises as product σ-algebra of and, and denotes the product measure of and. Then Tonelli's theorem allows us to rewrite Hölder's inequality using iterated integrals: If and are real- or complex-valued functions on the Cartesian product , then
This can be generalized to more than two measure spaces.
Vector-valued functions
Let denote a measure space and suppose that and are -measurable functions on, taking values in the -dimensional real- or complex Euclidean space. By taking the product with the counting measure on, we can rewrite the above product measure version of Hölder's inequality in the formIf the two integrals on the right-hand side are finite, then equality holds if and only if there exist real numbers, not both of them zero, such that
for -almost all in.
This finite-dimensional version generalizes to functions and taking values in a normed space which could be for example a sequence space or an inner product space.
Proof of Hölder's inequality
There are several proofs of Hölder's inequality; the main idea in the following is Young's inequality for products.If, then is zero -almost everywhere, and the product is zero -almost everywhere, hence the left-hand side of Hölder's inequality is zero. The same is true if. Therefore, we may assume and in the following.
If or, then the right-hand side of Hölder's inequality is infinite. Therefore, we may assume that and are in.
If and, then almost everywhere and Hölder's inequality follows from the monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral. Similarly for and. Therefore, we may also assume .
Dividing and by and, respectively, we can assume that
We now use Young's inequality for products, which states that
for all nonnegative and, where equality is achieved if and only if. Hence
Integrating both sides gives
which proves the claim.
Under the assumptions and, equality holds if and only if almost everywhere. More generally, if and are in, then Hölder's inequality becomes an equality if and only if there exist real numbers, namely
such that
The case corresponds to in. The case corresponds to in.
Alternate proof using Jensen's inequality
Extremal equality
Statement
Assume that and let denote the Hölder conjugate. Then, for every,where max indicates that there actually is a maximizing the right-hand side. When and if each set in the with contains a subset with , then
Proof of the extremal equality
Remarks and examples
- The equality for fails whenever there exists a set of infinite measure in the -field with that has no subset that satisfies: Then the indicator function satisfies but every has to be -almost everywhere constant on because it is -measurable, and this constant has to be zero, because is -integrable. Therefore, the above supremum for the indicator function is zero and the extremal equality fails.
- For the supremum is in general not attained. As an example, let and the counting measure. Define:
Applications
- The extremal equality is one of the ways for proving the triangle inequality for all and in, see Minkowski inequality.
- Hölder's inequality implies that every defines a bounded linear functional on by the formula
Generalization of Hölder's inequality
. Then, for all measurable real- or complex-valued functions defined on,
.
In particular,
Note: For, contrary to the notation, is in general not a norm, because it doesn't satisfy the triangle inequality.
Proof of the generalization
Interpolation
Let and let denote weights with. Define as the weighted harmonic mean, i.e.,Given measurable real- or complex-valued functions on, then the above generalization of Hölder's inequality gives
In particular, taking gives
Specifying further and, in the case, we obtain the interpolation result
for and
An application of Hölder gives Lyapunov's inequality: If
then
and in particular
Both Littlewood and Lyapunov imply that if then for all
Reverse Hölder inequality
Assume that and that the measure space satisfies. Then, for all measurable real- or complex-valued functions and on such that for all,If
then the reverse Hölder inequality is an equality if and only if
Note: The expressions:
are not norms, they are just compact notations for
Proof of the reverse Hölder inequality
Conditional Hölder inequality
Let be a probability space, a, and Hölder conjugates, meaning that. Then, for all real- or complex-valued random variables and on ,Remarks:
- If a non-negative random variable has infinite expected value, then its conditional expectation is defined by
- On the right-hand side of the conditional Hölder inequality, 0 times ∞ as well as ∞ times 0 means 0. Multiplying with ∞ gives ∞.
Proof of the conditional Hölder inequality
Hölder's inequality for increasing seminorms
Let be a set and let be the space of all complex-valued functions on. Let be an increasing seminorm on meaning that, for all real-valued functions we have the following implication :Then:
where the numbers and are Hölder conjugates.
Remark: If is a measure space and is the upper Lebesgue integral of then the restriction of to all functions gives the usual version of Hölder's inequality.