GCC homosexuality test


Gulf Cooperation Council homosexuality test was a planned homosexuality test that would have been used in Kuwait and other Gulf states to prevent any homosexual travelers from entering the countries. The director of public health Yousuf Mindkar from the Kuwaiti Ministry of Health proposed that routine medical examinations would have also screened for homosexuality. Mindkar also spoke against allowing transgender people to enter Kuwait. Obtaining a visa already requires passing a health examination for migrant workers from certain countries. Those who would have failed the tests would have had their visas revoked.
It has been suggested that concern for hosting 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar, and fears for controversy in a case that football fans would have been screened, made Mindkar to backtrack the plans and insist that it was a mere proposal. The proposal was set to be discussed in Oman on 11 November 2013 by a central committee tasked with reviewing the situation concerning expatriates.
Previously in 2012 over 2 million expatriates across Gulf Cooperation Council countries were gender tested. Homosexuality is illegal in the Gulf Cooperation Council member states including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman.

Reactions

There is no known working medical test for homosexuality in existence. Some gay activists were worried that the Kuwaiti test would have used anal probes. Lebanon uses such methods at police stations to determine what sexual practices suspected criminals have engaged in. One such instance was in 2012 when a movie theater was raided for pornography and 36 Lebanese men were subjected to anal examinations. Peter Tatchell and the UK-based foundation carrying his name demanded boycotting or cancelling the 2022 FIFA World Cup that is to be held in Qatar. Amnesty International strongly opposed any plans to introduce tests for discriminatory purposes against sexual minorities.
It was also pointed out by Richard Lane from gay rights charity group Stonewall that restricting freedom of movement due to sexual orientation would be problematic to Gulf States that have marketed themselves as open to international business.