If a finite-dimensional continuous complex representation of a compact group G has character χ its Frobenius–Schur indicator is defined to be for Haar measure μ with μ = 1. When G is finite it is given by If χ is irreducible, then its Frobenius–Schur indicator is 1, 0, or -1. It provides a criterion for deciding whether an irreducible representation of G is real, complex or quaternionic, in a specific sense defined below. Much of the content below discusses the case of finite groups, but the general compact case is analogous.
If the ring is the real numbers, then V⊗C is an irreducible complex representation with Schur indicator 1, also called a real representation.
If the ring is the complex numbers, then V has two different conjugate complex structures, giving two irreducible complex representations with Schur indicator 0, sometimes called complex representations.
If the ring is the quaternions, then choosing a subring of the quaternions isomorphic to the complex numbers makes V into an irreducible complex representation of G with Schur indicator −1, called a quaternionic representation.
Moreover every irreducible representation on a complex vector space can be constructed from a unique irreducible representation on a real vector space in one of the three ways above. So knowing the irreducible representations on complex spaces and their Schur indicators allows one to read off the irreducible representations on real spaces. Real representations can be complexified to get a complex representation of the same dimension and complex representations can be converted into a real representation of twice the dimension by treating the real and imaginary components separately. Also, since all finite dimensional complex representations can be turned into a unitary representation, for unitary representations the dual representation is also a conjugate representation because the Hilbert space norm gives an antilinearbijective map from the representation to its dual representation. Self-dual complex irreducible representation correspond to either real irreducible representation of the same dimension or real irreducible representations of twice the dimension called quaternionic representations and non-self-dual complex irreducible representation correspond to a real irreducible representation of twice the dimension. Note for the latter case, both the complex irreducible representation and its dual give rise to the same real irreducible representation. An example of a quaternionic representation would be the four-dimensional real irreducible representation of the quaternion groupQ8.
If is the underlying vector space of a representation of a group, then the tensor product representation can be decomposed as the direct sum of two subrepresentations, the symmetric square, denoted or and the alternating square, denoted or. In terms of these square representations, the indicator has the following, alternate definition: where is the trivial representation. To see this, note that the term naturally arises in the characters of these representations; to wit, we haveand
.
Substituting either of these formulae, the Frobenius–Schur indicator takes on the structure of the natural -invariant inner product on class functions:The inner product counts the multiplicities of direct summands; the equivalence of the definitions then follows immediately.
Applications
Let be an irreducible complex representation of a group . Then
if and only if is real but cannot be realized over .
Higher Frobenius-Schur indicators
Just as for any complex representation ρ, is a self-intertwiner, for any integer n, is also a self-intertwiner. By Schur's lemma, this will be a multiple of the identity for irreducible representations. The trace of this self-intertwiner is called the nthFrobenius-Schur indicator. The original case of the Frobenius–Schur indicator is that for n = 2. The zeroth indicator is the dimension of the irreducible representation, the first indicator would be 1 for the trivial representation and zero for the other irreducible representations. It resembles the Casimir invariants for Lie algebra irreducible representations. In fact, since any representation of G can be thought of as a module for C and vice versa, we can look at the center of C. This is analogous to looking at the center of the universal enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra. It is simple to check that belongs to the center of C, which is simply the subspace of class functions on G.