Economists' statement opposing the Bush tax cuts

Content

Economic growth, though positive, has not been sufficient to generate jobs and prevent unemployment from rising. In fact,
there are now more than two million fewer private sector jobs than at the start of the current recession. Overcapacity,
corporate scandals, and uncertainty have and will continue to weigh down the economy.
The tax cut plan proposed by President Bush is not the answer to these problems. Regardless of how one views the specifics
of the Bush plan, there is wide agreement that its purpose is a permanent change in the tax structure and not the creation
of jobs and growth in the near-term. The permanent dividend tax cut, in particular, is not credible as a short-term stimulus.
As tax reform, the dividend tax cut is misdirected in that it targets individuals rather than corporations, is overly
complex, and could be, but is not, part of a revenue-neutral tax reform effort.
Passing these tax cuts will worsen the long-term budget outlook, adding to the nation’s projected chronic deficits. This
fiscal deterioration will reduce the capacity of the government to finance Social Security and Medicare benefits as well as
investments in schools, health, infrastructure, and basic research. Moreover, the proposed tax cuts will generate further
inequalities in after-tax income.
To be effective, a stimulus plan should rely on immediate but temporary spending and tax measures to expand demand,
and it should also rely on immediate but temporary incentives for investment. Such a stimulus plan would spur growth
and jobs in the short term without exacerbating the long-term budget outlook.

Signatories

• George Akerlof, University of California – Berkeley
• Kenneth J. Arrow, Stanford University
• Peter Diamond, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• Lawrence R. Klein University of Pennsylvania
• Daniel L. McFadden University of California – Berkeley
• Franco Modigliani Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• Douglass C. North Washington University
• Paul A. Samuelson Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• William F. Sharpe Stanford University
• Robert M. Solow Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• Joseph Stiglitz Columbia University

  Response

• Annelise Anderson Stanford University
• James T. Bennett George Mason University
• Martin Feldstein Harvard University
• Joel W. Hay University of Southern California
• Robert J. Hodrick Columbia University
• Michael C. Jensen Harvard Business School
• Burton Malkiel Princeton University
• Gregory Mankiw Harvard University
• Carmen M. Reinhart International Monetary Fund
• Vernon L. Smith George Mason University
• Richard E. Wagner George Mason University
• Steven N. Kaplan University of Chicago
• Edward C. Prescott University of Minnesota