The tree-depth of an undirected graph has a very similar definition, using undirected connectivity and connected components in place of strong connectivity and strongly connected components.
History
Cycle rank was introduced by in the context of star height of regular languages. It was rediscovered by as a generalization of undirected tree-depth, which had been developed beginning in the 1980s and applied to sparse matrix computations.
Examples
The cycle rank of a directed acyclic graph is 0, while a complete digraph of order n with a self-loop at each vertex has cycle rank n. Apart from these, the cycle rank of a few other digraphs is known: the undirected path of order n, which possesses a symmetric edge relation and no self-loops, has cycle rank . For the directed -torus, i.e., the cartesian product of two directed circuits of lengths m and n, we have and for m ≠ n.
Computing the cycle rank
Computing the cycle rank is computationally hard: proves that the corresponding decision problem is NP-complete, even for sparse digraphs of maximum outdegree at most 2. On the positive side, the problem is solvable in time on digraphs of maximum outdegree at most 2, and in time on general digraphs. There is an approximation algorithm with approximation ratio.
a set of labeled edges δ, referred to as transition relation: Q × × Q. Here ε denotes the empty word.
an initial state q0 ∈ Q
a set of states F distinguished as accepting statesF ⊆ Q.
A word w ∈ Σ* is accepted by the ε-NFA if there exists a directed path from the initial state q0 to some final state in F using edges from δ, such that the concatenation of all labels visited along the path yields the wordw. The set of all words over Σ* accepted by the automaton is the language accepted by the automaton A. When speaking of digraph properties of a nondeterministic finite automatonA with state set Q, we naturally address the digraph with vertex set Q induced by its transition relation. Now the theorem is stated as follows. Proofs of this theorem are given by, and more recently by.
Another application of this concept lies in sparse matrix computations, namely for using nested dissection to compute the Cholesky factorization of a matrix in parallel. A given sparse -matrix M may be interpreted as the adjacency matrix of some symmetric digraph G on n vertices, in a way such that the non-zero entries of the matrix are in one-to-one correspondence with the edges of G. If the cycle rank of the digraph G is at most k, then the Cholesky factorization of M can be computed in at most k steps on a parallel computer with processors.