Andrew Sayer


Andrew Sayer is Professor of Social Theory and Political Economy at Lancaster University, UK. He is known for significant contributions to methodology and theory in the social sciences.

Education

Andrew Sayer studied a BA in Geography at Cambridgeshire College of Arts and Technology in the late 1960s, and then did an MA and D.Phil. in Urban and Regional Studies at Sussex University in the early 1970s. He was lecturer in the School of Social Sciences at Sussex until he moved to a lectureship at Lancaster University in 1993. Although affiliated with sociology, he has affinities with other disciplines, particularly philosophy, human geography, urban and regional studies and political economy, and defines himself as 'post-disciplinary'.

Scholarship

Sayer's early work was on radical understandings of uneven development in Western societies, and urban and regional change. His book with Kevin Morgan, Microcircuits of Capital, was a result. He reworked aspects of political economy and Marxist thought. In the late 1990s he incorporated a cultural understanding of political-economic change, building on Pierre Bourdieu's work on economic and cultural capital. The Moral Significance of Class analyses the ethical aspects of people's experience of class inequalities: how people value one another and themselves. Since then most of his work has been on moral economy and its links to political economy, and on the ethical dimension of everyday life. These interests are reflected in his Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life, and his Why we can't afford the rich.
He is perhaps best known for his effort to recast the philosophy and methodology of the social sciences, developing critical realism as a philosophy of and for the social sciences. Critical realism argues for "theoretically informed concrete research". Method in Social Science has been cited over 4230 times as of Feb. 2016. Debates about Sayer's approach have been extensive, particularly regarding his view that empirical modelling techniques in the social sciences cannot show real causal relationships, and his dissatisfaction with social constructionism and postmodernism.

Awards