2009 European Parliament election in Slovakia
The European Parliament election of 2009 in Slovakia was the election of the delegation from Slovakia to the European Parliament in 2009.
The turnout, although increased compared to the previous election, was 19.63%, the lowest of any nation involved in the election.
Results
Division of seats
The system of dividing seats to the different lists is somewhat different in Slovakia, compared to some other countries. Firstly the election authorities count the total number of valid votes for parties who have gained more than 5% of the total. In this case there were 709004 such votes. This number is divided by 14 to create the RVC or quota, in this case 50643. Parties are assigned one seat for the number of times they fill the quota. At this initial stage 5 seats were awarded to SMER, 2 to SDKU, 1 to SMK, 1 to KDH and 1 to HZDS leaving 3 seats still unfilled.In Slovakia's system of proportional representation, the parties needing the fewest votes to get to their next quota are given the remaining seats. In this case those seats went to SMK, KDH and SNS. This is described in more detail at https://web.archive.org/web/20091119032933/http://www.volbysr.sk/volbyep2009/sr/tab4_en.html
In the D'Hondt method of proportional representation, the quota is progressively reduced until it reaches a number at which the correct number of candidates is elected. If this system had been applied in Slovakia, it would have resulted in the quota being reduced to 45960, with the remaining 3 seats going to SDKU, SMK and SNS.
Awarding of seats to candidates
Each voter who voted for a party was also allowed to select two candidates from that party. The seats were awarded to candidates in order of the number of preference votes they received, provided that they received preferences from at least 10 percent of all the voters who chose the particular party.Direction – Social Democracy (SMER)
List Ranking | Name | Valid Preferential Votes |
1 | Boris Zala | 102940 |
2 | Vladimír Maňka | 42885 |
3 | Monika Flašíková – Beňová | 107097 |
4 | Monika Smolková | 15830 |
5 | Katarína Neveďalová | 4378 |
6 | Alexander Kurtanský | 5221 |
7 | Peter Hanulík | 10202 |
8 | Gabriela Kečkéšová | 3838 |
9 | Peter Markovič | 4793 |
10 | Jozef Štrba | 5964 |
11 | Vladislav Petráš | 1905 |
12 | Svetlana Pavlovičová | 12095 |
13 | Milan Magát | 3241 |
Monika Flašíková – Beňová, Boris Zala and Vladimír Maňka were awarded seats they had the most personal preference votes and had received those votes from at least 10 percent of SMER's voters. The remaining seats were awarded on the basis of the party list ordering, the fourth seat going to Monika Smolková, and the fifth seat going to Katarína Neveďalová.
Slovak Democratic and Christian Union – Democratic Party (SDKÚ-DS)
List Ranking | Name | Valid Preferential Votes |
1 | Eduard Kukan | 80244 |
2 | Peter Šťastný | 41847 |
3 | Milan Gaľa | 11613 |
4 | Pavol Kubovič | 3955 |
5 | Jarmila Tkáčová | 5250 |
6 | Zita Pleštinská | 13386 |
7 | Juraj Šváč | 3098 |
8 | Marián Török | 2829 |
9 | Júlia Hurná | 2354 |
10 | Eugen Szép | 855 |
11 | Alexander Slafkovský | 4411 |
12 | Štefan Mikula | 1534 |
Eduard Kukan and Peter Šťastný were awarded seats they had the most personal preference votes and had received those votes from at least 10 percent of the SDKU's voters.
Party of the Hungarian Coalition (SMK)
List Ranking | Name | Valid Preferential Votes |
1 | Edit Bauer | 39721 |
2 | Alajos Mészáros | 20652 |
3 | Attila Lancz | 5358 |
4 | Sándor Albert | 12380 |
5 | Szabolcs Hodosy | 11139 |
6 | Zoltán Bara | 6398 |
7 | Gábor Klenovics | 2297 |
8 | Zsuzsanna Andrássy | 4863 |
9 | Pál Banai Tóth | 3674 |
10 | Béla Keszegh | 7746 |
11 | Csaba Cúth | 4581 |
12 | Július Slovák | 2918 |
13 | Gergely Agócs | 3021 |
Edit Bauer and Alajos Mészáros were awarded seats they had the most personal preference votes and had received those votes from at least 10 percent of the SMK's voters.
Christian Democratic Movement (KDH)
List Ranking | Name | Valid Preferential Votes |
1 | Martin Fronc | 15861 |
2 | Ján Hudacký | 17730 |
3 | Anna Záborská | 43356 |
4 | Miroslav Mikolášik | 29764 |
5 | Ján Vančo | 2486 |
6 | Peter Lenč | 1087 |
7 | Renáta Ocilková | 2078 |
8 | Pavol Kossey | 3655 |
9 | Martin Hladký | 711 |
10 | Martin Krajčovič | 888 |
11 | Martin Kalafut | 600 |
12 | Jozef Bobík | 2100 |
13 | Ján Morovič | 1288 |
Anna Záborská and Miroslav Mikolášik were awarded seats they had the most personal preference votes and had received those votes from at least 10 percent of the KDH's voters.
People's Party – Movement for a Democratic Slovakia (ĽS-HZDS)
List Ranking | Name | Valid Preferential Votes |
1 | Sergej Kozlík | 41 990 |
2 | Peter Baco | 21226 |
3 | Irena Belohorská | 22948 |
4 | Ivana Kapráliková | 2147 |
5 | Diana Štrofová | 1950 |
6 | Ján Kovarčík | 1711 |
7 | Jaroslav Jaduš | 1399 |
8 | Jaroslav Ďaďo | 2952 |
9 | Pavol Krištof | 1150 |
10 | Beáta Sániová | 955 |
11 | Jana Kandráčová | 1093 |
12 | Igor Liška | 893 |
13 | Ladislav Kokoška | 851 |
Sergej Kozlík was awarded the seat as he had the most personal preference votes and had received those votes from at least 10 percent of HZDS's voters.
Slovak National Party (SNS)
Jaroslav Paška was awarded the one SNS seat, as he had the most personal preference votes and had received those votes from at least 10 percent of the SNS's electors.The overall effect of preference voting and the 10% rule
Of the 13 candidate elected, 11 were elected due to the number of personal preference votes they were given, and 2 were elected due to their positions on the party lists.The 11 candidates elected due to personal preferences included 3 whose list positions did not in themselves justify a seat so could be said to have been elected solely by preferential voting. The remaining 8 candidates all would have been elected anyway if there was no preference voting in the system and the party list ordering had been used alone. It is important to note however, that these 8 people would not have been elected if their personal voters had chosen other candidates, so they were not in any way guaranteed seats as a result of their list positions.
The two candidates elected due to their positions on the party lists were from SMER. One would also have been elected due to her personal preferences if the 10 percent rule had not been in operation but the other was elected solely as a result of her position on the party list.