1963 Sarawak district council elections
The second Sarawak district council elections was held in 1963. The results of the election was announced from 18 to 25 June 1963. A total of 185,000 voters cast votes in this election. A total of 998 candidates were vying for 429 district council seats in Sarawak.
Background
On 27 May 1961, Tunku Abdul Rahman, the prime minister of the Federation of Malaya, announced a plan to form a greater federation together with Singapore, Sarawak, Sabah and Brunei, to be called Malaysia. On 17 January 1962, the Cobbold Commission was formed to gauge the support of Sarawak and Sabah for the plan; the Commission reported 80 percent support for federation. As the target date 31 August 1963 for the creation of Malaysia was fast approaching, the four parties were going nowhere on their negotiations with Malaya. Singapore prime minister Lee Kuan Yew had refused previous financial terms nearing settlement after a rift with Malayan Chinese Association. The Sultan of Brunei also halted financial negotiation with Malaya. Sultan of Brunei was reported to questioned his precedence in the Malaysian Conference of Rulers and was apparently unsatisfied at his fourth position in the hierarchy. However, he later denied the breakdown of Brunei-Malaya talk was due to the issue of precedence.The political system in Sarawak was so new that defections and realignment of political parties can almost certainly be expected. There were three major political parties in Sarawak at that time: Sarawak United Peoples' Party, Parti Negara Sarawak, and Sarawak Alliance. SUPP was led by Ong Kee Hui, who was a banking executive and also a Kuching Municipal Council chairman. Another prominent leader of the party, Stephen Young, was an English and Chinese educated barrister working in Kuching. However, SUPP was also infiltrated with communist supporters. Although the party was non-racial, the majority of its members were Chinese. On the other hand, PANAS was a member of the Alliance. PANAS broke away from the Alliance in April 1963 because of its dissatisfaction of alleged interference of local affairs by the Malayan Alliance Party. Although PANAS leadership was multi-racial, it became predominantly a Malay party. Meanwhile, Alliance comprised four parties: Sarawak National Party, Parti Pesaka Sarawak, Barisan Ra'ayat Jati Sarawak, and Sarawak Chinese Association. SNAP was led by the party secretary, namely Stephen Kalong Ningkan, where he drawn his support from the Iban people of the second division of Sarawak. PESAKA was founded by Temenggung Jugah after his defection from PANAS in 1962. The PESAKA party drawn its support from the Ibans of the third division of Sarawak. BARJASA was representing Malays in the anti-cessionist faction. Lastly, SCA was founded by Ling Beng Siew. He was the former founder of PESAKA and was defeated in his own ward in 1959 elections.
Electoral system
Sarawak had an indirect three-tiered electoral system. The British colonial government installed such a system for the then politically immature Sarawak so that the legislators can have some governmental experience during their tenure in office. The state was divided into 24 local authority areas, each headed by a district council which composed of elected members from single-member constituencies. All the 24 districts then grouped together to form five divisions and each division was headed by a divisional advisory council elected by the respective district councils. The divisional advisory councils then functioned to elect 36 members into Council Negri. Meanwhile, the Council Negri would select 24 members of parliament to sit in the Parliament of Malaysia. Despite being elected as members of parliament, the representatives would still be answerable to Council Negri, divisional councils, and district councils below them.Results
District councils
Of the total 429 district council seats, Sarawak Alliance won 138 seats, SUPP won 116, independents won 116 seats, and PANAS won 59 seats. On the percentage of total votes, Alliance won 30.6%, independents won 29.7%, SUPP won 24.5%, and PANAS won 15.2% of the votes. SUPP became the dominant party representing the Chinese after the election. The party was initially troubled with allegations of communist infiltration. Besides, three newspapers in support of the party were banned by the government under the Preservation of Public Security Ordinance. SUPP also faced stiff competition with SCA where the latter enjoyed support from the Peninsular based Malayan Chinese Association. Although SUPP lost a substantial number of Chinese votes in four out of five urban centres, it did not prevent SUPP from winning district council seats in these areas. The party also enjoyed considerable support in several non-Chinese seats. At the same time, Alliance victory was built on the overwhelming support of the Iban people to SNAP and PESAKA. Alliance captured six out of eight Iban majority districts. Although PANAS was attacked by the Alliance for deserting the latter just before the election; PANAS was able to capture 53 out of 118 seats at the first and second divisions of Sarawak. Besides, the party was able to make inroads northwards into Bintulu and Miri districts. Therefore, PANAS was seen as the voice for the Malays in the first and second divisions of Sarawak.Divisional councils
After the district council elections, each district council met from 1 July to 5 July 1963 in order to choose one to eight representatives into their respective divisional councils. Although PANAS had the most number of seats in the first division, it required support of the three independents to form a majority in this division. The Alliance formed a clear majority in the second division, but required the support of independents in the third division in order to form a majority. In the fourth and fifth divisions, independents clearly had an upper hand when compared to other political parties.| Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils | Composition of the divisional councils |
| Divisional councils | Total seats | Alliance | PANAS | SUPP | Independents | - | - |
| First Division | 25 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 3 | - | - |
| Second Division | 22 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | - | - |
| Third Division | 27 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 6 | - | - |
| Fourth Division | 22 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 11 | - | - |
| Fifth Division | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | - | - |
Council Negri
With the announcement of SUPP-PANAS coalition on 1 July, both the parties were able to command a majority in the first division of Sarawak. However, by 15 July, Alliance had an upper hand in third, fourth, and fifth divisions of Sarawak. Therefore, the Alliance was able to command 19 out of 36 seats in the Council Negri. With additional support from the independents, Alliance was able to command 26 seats in the Council Negri. Meanwhile SUPP-PANAS coalition was only able to command ten of the Council Negri seats.| Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri | Composition of Council Negri |
| Divisional councils | Total seats | Alliance | SUPP | PANAS | Independents | - | - |
| First Division | 10 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | - | - |
| Second Division | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
| Third Division | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
| Fourth Division | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | - | - |
| Fifth Division | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | - | - |